Perspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicos
Descripción del Articulo
This book, like the first volume, is basically a collection of papers with the principal aim of offering the practical applications of the theory presented in volume 1. In consequence, this review will be, also, intends chapter by chapter. The first chapter intend to show communication in plants und...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2008 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revista UNMSM - Revista Peruana de Biología |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/1692 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/1692 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
id |
1727-9933_c0e17a71bce9d65a133e8ac65b6c3b0b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/1692 |
network_acronym_str |
1727-9933 |
repository_id_str |
. |
network_name_str |
Revista UNMSM - Revista Peruana de Biología |
spelling |
Perspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicosViewpoint of biosemiotic in biological casesCabrera Febola, WalterThis book, like the first volume, is basically a collection of papers with the principal aim of offering the practical applications of the theory presented in volume 1. In consequence, this review will be, also, intends chapter by chapter. The first chapter intend to show communication in plants under the biosemiotic paradigm, which involves sign processes that are realized among plants of different species, plants with other organisms, and also among cells, and, even, in cells of the same plant. To that aim the author provides interesting examples in each kind of interaction. What is worth to note is the proposition that chemical molecules function as signs and that they are interpreted which implies that they are differing from molecules that not form part of messages, which are noise. In connection to this it should be noted the sense of the term semiochemicals that the author specifies, he points out that it must embrace all chemicals which are involved as signs, in sign-mediated interactions in and between organisms. Which is also interesting is the similarity between plants and animals in the developing of immune substances and even more the synapse-like communication among all parts of the plant and recognition in neuronal-like networks, that are a possible explanation of some kind of memory shown by plants, all this could be part of an underlying principle that could be called the relativity constancy of patterns. What seems something misleading is the assertion that plants have a decentralized nervous system which seems not proved.This book, like the first volume, is basically a collection of papers with the principal aim of offering the practical applications of the theory presented in volume 1. In consequence, this review will be, also, intends chapter by chapter. The first chapter intend to show communication in plants under the biosemiotic paradigm, which involves sign processes that are realized among plants of different species, plants with other organisms, and also among cells, and, even, in cells of the same plant. To that aim the author provides interesting examples in each kind of interaction. What is worth to note is the proposition that chemical molecules function as signs and that they are interpreted which implies that they are differing from molecules that not form part of messages, which are noise. In connection to this it should be noted the sense of the term semiochemicals that the author specifies, he points out that it must embrace all chemicals which are involved as signs, in sign-mediated interactions in and between organisms. Which is also interesting is the similarity between plants and animals in the developing of immune substances and even more the synapse-like communication among all parts of the plant and recognition in neuronal-like networks, that are a possible explanation of some kind of memory shown by plants, all this could be part of an underlying principle that could be called the relativity constancy of patterns. What seems something misleading is the assertion that plants have a decentralized nervous system which seems not proved.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas2008-04-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/169210.15381/rpb.v15i1.1692Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol 15 No 1 (2008); 143-144Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2008); 143-1441727-99331561-0837reponame:Revista UNMSM - Revista Peruana de Biologíainstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/1692/1467Derechos de autor 2008 Walter Cabrera Febolahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-01T17:46:22Zmail@mail.com - |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Perspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicos Viewpoint of biosemiotic in biological cases |
title |
Perspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicos |
spellingShingle |
Perspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicos Cabrera Febola, Walter |
title_short |
Perspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicos |
title_full |
Perspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicos |
title_fullStr |
Perspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicos |
title_sort |
Perspectivas de biosemiotica en casos biológicos |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cabrera Febola, Walter |
author |
Cabrera Febola, Walter |
author_facet |
Cabrera Febola, Walter |
author_role |
author |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This book, like the first volume, is basically a collection of papers with the principal aim of offering the practical applications of the theory presented in volume 1. In consequence, this review will be, also, intends chapter by chapter. The first chapter intend to show communication in plants under the biosemiotic paradigm, which involves sign processes that are realized among plants of different species, plants with other organisms, and also among cells, and, even, in cells of the same plant. To that aim the author provides interesting examples in each kind of interaction. What is worth to note is the proposition that chemical molecules function as signs and that they are interpreted which implies that they are differing from molecules that not form part of messages, which are noise. In connection to this it should be noted the sense of the term semiochemicals that the author specifies, he points out that it must embrace all chemicals which are involved as signs, in sign-mediated interactions in and between organisms. Which is also interesting is the similarity between plants and animals in the developing of immune substances and even more the synapse-like communication among all parts of the plant and recognition in neuronal-like networks, that are a possible explanation of some kind of memory shown by plants, all this could be part of an underlying principle that could be called the relativity constancy of patterns. What seems something misleading is the assertion that plants have a decentralized nervous system which seems not proved. This book, like the first volume, is basically a collection of papers with the principal aim of offering the practical applications of the theory presented in volume 1. In consequence, this review will be, also, intends chapter by chapter. The first chapter intend to show communication in plants under the biosemiotic paradigm, which involves sign processes that are realized among plants of different species, plants with other organisms, and also among cells, and, even, in cells of the same plant. To that aim the author provides interesting examples in each kind of interaction. What is worth to note is the proposition that chemical molecules function as signs and that they are interpreted which implies that they are differing from molecules that not form part of messages, which are noise. In connection to this it should be noted the sense of the term semiochemicals that the author specifies, he points out that it must embrace all chemicals which are involved as signs, in sign-mediated interactions in and between organisms. Which is also interesting is the similarity between plants and animals in the developing of immune substances and even more the synapse-like communication among all parts of the plant and recognition in neuronal-like networks, that are a possible explanation of some kind of memory shown by plants, all this could be part of an underlying principle that could be called the relativity constancy of patterns. What seems something misleading is the assertion that plants have a decentralized nervous system which seems not proved. |
description |
This book, like the first volume, is basically a collection of papers with the principal aim of offering the practical applications of the theory presented in volume 1. In consequence, this review will be, also, intends chapter by chapter. The first chapter intend to show communication in plants under the biosemiotic paradigm, which involves sign processes that are realized among plants of different species, plants with other organisms, and also among cells, and, even, in cells of the same plant. To that aim the author provides interesting examples in each kind of interaction. What is worth to note is the proposition that chemical molecules function as signs and that they are interpreted which implies that they are differing from molecules that not form part of messages, which are noise. In connection to this it should be noted the sense of the term semiochemicals that the author specifies, he points out that it must embrace all chemicals which are involved as signs, in sign-mediated interactions in and between organisms. Which is also interesting is the similarity between plants and animals in the developing of immune substances and even more the synapse-like communication among all parts of the plant and recognition in neuronal-like networks, that are a possible explanation of some kind of memory shown by plants, all this could be part of an underlying principle that could be called the relativity constancy of patterns. What seems something misleading is the assertion that plants have a decentralized nervous system which seems not proved. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-04-14 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/1692 10.15381/rpb.v15i1.1692 |
url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/1692 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/rpb.v15i1.1692 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/1692/1467 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2008 Walter Cabrera Febola http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2008 Walter Cabrera Febola http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol 15 No 1 (2008); 143-144 Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2008); 143-144 1727-9933 1561-0837 reponame:Revista UNMSM - Revista Peruana de Biología instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
reponame_str |
Revista UNMSM - Revista Peruana de Biología |
collection |
Revista UNMSM - Revista Peruana de Biología |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
instacron_str |
UNMSM |
institution |
UNMSM |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
-
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mail@mail.com |
_version_ |
1701387826924355584 |
score |
13.772021 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).