Comparison of the transverse size of maxillary lateral incisors without microdontia

Descripción del Articulo

Objective. To determine if there is a difference between the transverse sizes of the maxillary lateral incisors in the different Angle malocclusions and to determine the prevalence of maxillary lateral incisors with microdontia in the different Angle classes. Methods. The research is descriptive, tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Acosta-Pelayo, Alejandra Olivia, Gutiérrez-Rojo, Jaime Fabián
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revista UNMSM - Odontología Sanmarquina
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/18127
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/18127
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Tooth
Incisor
Prevalence
Malocclusion
(source: MeSH NLM)
Diente
Incisivo
Prevalencia
Maloclusión
(fuente: DeCS BIREME)
Descripción
Sumario:Objective. To determine if there is a difference between the transverse sizes of the maxillary lateral incisors in the different Angle malocclusions and to determine the prevalence of maxillary lateral incisors with microdontia in the different Angle classes. Methods. The research is descriptive, transversal and observational. The study universe was 780 orthodontic pre-treatment study models. The sample was 190 study models. Binder and Cohen's method was used to determine the presence of microdontia. Results. In Class I malocclusion a frequency of microdontia of 32% was found, in Class II malocclusion it was 35% and in Class III malocclusion it was 26%. The upper lateral incisors with microdontia and without microdontia have a statistically different mean between them at a confidence level greater than 95%, this difference is observed homogeneously in each of the malocclusions. Conclusions. No statistically significant differences in the mesiodistal size of the maxillary lateral incisors were observed when comparing the three malocclusions described by Angle. A higher percentage of microdontia was obtained in Class II malocclusion, and a lower percentage in Class III.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).