No presenta resumen

In this article, the author presents an analysis of the conception of law and legal education from a critical perspective, questioning the supposed political neutrality in legal education. In this context, he highlights that the training of lawyers cannot be separated from political evaluation, as education implicitly transmits behavioral guidelines with an evaluative background. Furthermore, he criticizes the idea of teaching law as a politically neutral process, asserting that this stance is intentionally conservative and that legal education is, in fact, a means of social control. Following this line of argument, the author contends that traditional legal education, focused on exegesis and formalism, limits lawyers' ability to understand and evaluate the social and political implications of law. In contrast, he suggests reconsidering legal education so that lawyers acquire a realistic...

In this article, the author presents an analysis of the conception of law and legal education from a critical perspective, questioning the supposed political neutrality in legal education. In this context, he highlights that the training of lawyers cannot be separated from political evaluation, as education implicitly transmits behavioral guidelines with an evaluative background. Furthermore, he criticizes the idea of teaching law as a politically neutral process, asserting that this stance is intentionally conservative and that legal education is, in fact, a means of social control. Following this line of argument, the author contends that traditional legal education, focused on exegesis and formalism, limits lawyers' ability to understand and evaluate the social and political implications of law. In contrast, he suggests reconsidering legal education so that lawyers acquire a realistic...