No description

No presenta resumen

Volumen 1. Páginas 191-208

Páginas [334]-342

No description

This paper attempts to show first that the various interpretations of personal identity afforded by recent trends in phenomenology can be assembled into two distinctive groups. On the one hand, a description has been provided of movements, structures or orders into which supposedly subjectivity is dispersed or decentered (J. Patocka, H. Rombach, B. Waldenfels). On the other, it s contended that subjetivity develops on the ground of an original emotional dimension or as a reply to the requirement of responsibility for others (M. Henry, E. Levinas, P. Ricoeur). Second, the article tries to make clear that the post-Husserlian phenornenologies cannot elude the primary sense of identity which Husserl has designated with the name of ego-pole in order to highlight within the monad a centering and unity moment by which "the ego itself is existent for itself in continous evidence" (Hua. l, 100). ...

Este trabajo intenta mostrar en primer lugar que las diversas interpretaciones de la identidad proporcionadas por tendencias recientes en la fenomenología pueden ser reunidas en dos grupos diferentes. De un lado, se ha proporcionado una descripción de los movimientos, estructuras u órdenes en que supuestamente se dispersa o descentra la subjetividad (J. Patocka, H. Rombach, B. Waldenfels). Del otro, se ha sostenido que la subjetividad se desarrolla sobre la base de una dimensión emocional originaria como una respuesta a la exigencia de responsabilidad por los otros (M. Henry, E. Levinas, P. Ricoeur). En segundo lugar, el artículo procura poner en claro que las fenomenologías posthusserlianas no pueden eludir el sentido primario de la identidad que Husserl ha designado con el nombre de polo-yo a fin de poner de relieve dentro de la mónada un momento de centralización y unidad por ...

This paper attempts to show first that the various interpretations of personal identity afforded by recent trends in phenomenology can be assembled into two distinctive groups. On the one hand, a description has been provided of movements, structures or orders into which supposedly subjectivity is dispersed or decentered (J. Patocka, H. Rombach, B. Waldenfels). On the other, it s contended that subjetivity develops on the ground of an original emotional dimension or as a reply to the requirement of responsibility for others (M. Henry, E. Levinas, P. Ricoeur). Second, the article tries to make clear that the post-Husserlian phenornenologies cannot elude the primary sense of identity which Husserl has designated with the name of ego-pole in order to highlight within the monad a centering and unity moment by which "the ego itself is existent for itself in continous evidence" (Hua. l, 100). ...