The crime of abuse of economic power in Peru has undergone a fluctuating regulatory evolution, reflecting the tension between criminal intervention and administrative regulation in economic matters. Its criminalization, currently contained in article 232 of the Criminal Code, responds to the need to punish anticompetitive practices of absolute prohibition. In this context, the competence of INDECOPI to previously establish the existence of an administrative infringement introduces a referral mechanism that conditions the criminal prosecution.

The crime of abuse of economic power in Peru has undergone a fluctuating regulatory evolution, reflecting the tension between criminal intervention and administrative regulation in economic matters. Its criminalization, currently contained in article 232 of the Criminal Code, responds to the need to punish anticompetitive practices of absolute prohibition. In this context, the competence of INDECOPI to previously establish the existence of an administrative infringement introduces a referral mechanism that conditions the criminal prosecution.

No presenta resumen

In this paper, the authors discuss the maintenance obligation recognized by Peruvian civil laws, which the civil judge analyzes taking into account the economic capacity of the debtor. On the other hand, the Peruvian law typifies the crime of omission of family assistance, which is verified by the sole breach of the obligation by the debtor. However, criminal jurisprudence has not taken into account the concept of economic capacity as an objective element of this offence, unlike their civil counterpart. Thus, the authors discuss the need to include the economic capacity of the debtor in the analysis of the crime of omission of family assistance.

In this paper, the authors discuss the maintenance obligation recognized by Peruvian civil laws, which the civil judge analyzes taking into account the economic capacity of the debtor. On the other hand, the Peruvian law typifies the crime of omission of family assistance, which is verified by the sole breach of the obligation by the debtor. However, criminal jurisprudence has not taken into account the concept of economic capacity as an objective element of this offence, unlike their civil counterpart. Thus, the authors discuss the need to include the economic capacity of the debtor in the analysis of the crime of omission of family assistance.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

En los últimos meses se han consolidado las operaciones comerciales virtuales como las transferencias realizadas a través de los monederos digitales, lo que demuestra claramente una transformación sin retorno de nuestra convivencia socioeconómica común. Desde marzo del 2020 hasta la fecha, nos enfrentamos a un nuevo modo de adquisición de activos, pago de servicios e incluso formas de trabajo. Esta “evolución” hacia el mundo informático y virtual ha aportado muchos beneficios. Sin embargo, también ha generado innumerables dificultades. Uno de los problemas más relevantes y significativos son las actividades delictivas cometidas a través de los sistemas informáticos, las cuales han sido debidamente reguladas por nuestro legislador nacional en la Ley 30096, Ley de Delitos Informáticos, modificada por la Ley 30171. El presente artículo abordará los delitos de fraude infor...

In this paper, the authors discuss the maintenance obligation recognized by Peruvian civil laws, which the civil judge analyzes taking into account the economic capacity of the debtor. On the other hand, the Peruvian law typifies the crime of omission of family assistance, which is verified by the sole breach of the obligation by the debtor. However, criminal jurisprudence has not taken into account the concept of economic capacity as an objective element of this offence, unlike their civil counterpart. Thus, the authors discuss the need to include the economic capacity of the debtor in the analysis of the crime of omission of family assistance.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

In this paper, the authors discuss the maintenance obligation recognized by Peruvian civil laws, which the civil judge analyzes taking into account the economic capacity of the debtor. On the other hand, the Peruvian law typifies the crime of omission of family assistance, which is verified by the sole breach of the obligation by the debtor. However, criminal jurisprudence has not taken into account the concept of economic capacity as an objective element of this offence, unlike their civil counterpart. Thus, the authors discuss the need to include the economic capacity of the debtor in the analysis of the crime of omission of family assistance.