The objective of this research was to know if there were differences in the psychological processes of reading regarding the socio-economic level and gender of 965 students from 1st to 6 th grade of primary from private and public schools of Callao. For this purpose we adapted and created scales for the battery for Reading processes evaluation - revised (PROLEC-R) by. Cuetos, et al (2007). A comparative descriptive design was used. Significant differences according the socioeconomic level in all grades were found in reading comprehension and oral comprehension. It was also found differences in identification of letters and understanding of sentences (except in 6 th) and punctuation (except in second grade). There are no differ rences in the task of identifying “same–different” words and reading of words (except for 1st grade) and pseudowords (except in 1st and 3 rd) reading and gra...

The objective of this research was to know if there were differences in the psychological processes of reading regarding the socio-economic level and gender of 965 students from 1st to 6 th grade of primary from private and public schools of Callao. For this purpose we adapted and created scales for the battery for Reading processes evaluation - revised (PROLEC-R) by. Cuetos, et al (2007). A comparative descriptive design was used. Significant differences according the socioeconomic level in all grades were found in reading comprehension and oral comprehension. It was also found differences in identification of letters and understanding of sentences (except in 6 th) and punctuation (except in second grade). There are no differ rences in the task of identifying “same–different” words and reading of words (except for 1st grade) and pseudowords (except in 1st and 3 rd) reading and gra...

The study sought to determine if differences exist psycholinguistic and communication among university students, given their different linguistic and sociocultural reality. 20 students of Greater National University of San Marcos (Castilian dialect of coastal riverine), 18 students of the National University San Agustin de Arequipa (Castilian southern Andes) and 28 students of the National University of Huancavelica (Quechua Castilian interlectal condition) was examined ). The brief bilingual Test (González 2006) and experimental psycholinguistic tests was used: auditory perception, lexical processes, semantic and pragmatic processes, both in understanding and oral production. The results showed differences in most dimensions of oral language: comprehension (speech perception, word recognition, syntactic and semantic domain) and production (object recognition, semantic fluency, syntacti...

The study sought to determine if differences exist psycholinguistic and communication among university students, given their different linguistic and sociocultural reality. 20 students of Greater National University of San Marcos (Castilian dialect of coastal riverine), 18 students of the National University San Agustin de Arequipa (Castilian southern Andes) and 28 students of the National University of Huancavelica (Quechua Castilian interlectal condition) was examined ). The brief bilingual Test (González 2006) and experimental psycholinguistic tests was used: auditory perception, lexical processes, semantic and pragmatic processes, both in understanding and oral production. The results showed differences in most dimensions of oral language: comprehension (speech perception, word recognition, syntactic and semantic domain) and production (object recognition, semantic fluency, syntacti...