To have been issued in Peru two resolutions whose contents are conflicting as to the constitutional right to life, a Resolution N° just about this issue -SA/DM issued by the Ministry of Health and the Resolution N° 02005-2009-PA/CT scan of the Constitutional Court of Peru was of interest to explore the impact both in the legal field as well as a social. To demonstrate this, it then proceeded to take information on those resolutions, which have formed the material for the study, for which he was useful the analytic-synthetic method to identify the contradictory aspects of these two legal instruments aimed at the right to life of the unborn child. The data is presented in a comparative table, which highlights the approval of the Ministry of Health to distribute the pill emergency oral and the judgment of the Constitutional Court, in the which prohibits its free distribution. It is implic...

The object of study of the present research, was oriented to the study of the judicial consequence that originates the use of the oral emergency postcoital contraceptive pill versus the right to life of the embryo. Due to there is no scientific certainty about the exact moment that human life starts, the indiscriminate use of the oral emergency postcoital contraceptive pill has different treatments in each country. Since the legal pont of view, is the jurisprudence which comes proclaiming in respect to the risk for the right to the life of the embryo that implies its use, even though in some cases it is limited to solve the problem forbidding its sale and circulation. The procedure to demonstrate this legal consecuence was based on a simple haphazard sample which could apply the respective instrument to three hundred high-school students among private and state high schools and students ...