This article addresses the subject of secondary adjustment on transfer pricing, focusing on its nature and its regulation in Peru. To do this, the author explains the concept and purpose of transfer pricing and also elaborates some terminological precisions concerning adjustments on transfer pricing, defining the primary adjustments, the compensating ones, the correlative ones and, in more depth, the secondary ones. Likewise, the author explains the way secondary adjustments of transfer prices are regulated by the Peruvian Income Tax Law.

This article addresses the subject of secondary adjustment on transfer pricing, focusing on its nature and its regulation in Peru. To do this, the author explains the concept and purpose of transfer pricing and also elaborates some terminological precisions concerning adjustments on transfer pricing, defining the primary adjustments, the compensating ones, the correlative ones and, in more depth, the secondary ones. Likewise, the author explains the way secondary adjustments of transfer prices are regulated by the Peruvian Income Tax Law.

This article addresses the treatment of income obtained by directors, members of boards and management bodies of companies domiciled in the country. The particular source rule that our Income Tax Law contemplates for said subjects, when they act abroad in the exercise of their functions, is analyzed. In the first place, the origins of the provision and the reasons that would have been had to broaden the connection criterion are addressed. Then, its scope of application is revised, with emphasis on the subjects and incomes included, and the unwanted situations that fall within its scope of incidence. Finally, the double taxation problems that the provision generates are comment, discussing some legal formulas that could be used to mitigate them.

No description

Discrimination concerning taxpayers is often found in every tax system, which allows double tax burden to happen. It is for this reason that agreements such as the Double Taxation conventions and the Andean Community Resolution 578 arise, which refer to the non discrimination principle. In the following article, the author proposes a new way to interpret this non-discrimination principle contained in the Andean Community Resolution 578, analyzing Peru's context and legislation in order to determine how to solve this problem when, for example, there is a differentiated treatment and a consequent unfair taxation to those who domicile abroad.

Discrimination concerning taxpayers is often found in every tax system, which allows double tax burden to happen. It is for this reason that agreements such as the Double Taxation conventions and the Andean Community Resolution 578 arise, which refer to the non discrimination principle. In the following article, the author proposes a new way to interpret this non-discrimination principle contained in the Andean Community Resolution 578, analyzing Peru's context and legislation in order to determine how to solve this problem when, for example, there is a differentiated treatment and a consequent unfair taxation to those who domicile abroad.

No contiene resumen

El presente artículo aborda el tratamiento de las rentas obtenidas por los directores, miembros de consejos y órganos administrativos de empresas domiciliadas en el país. Se analiza la regla particular de fuente que nuestra Ley del Impuesto a la Renta contempla para dichos sujetos cuando actúan en el exterior en ejercicio de sus funciones. En primer lugar, se abordan los orígenes de la disposición y las razones que se habrían tenido para ampliar el criterio de conexión. Luego, se analiza su ámbito de aplicación, con énfasis en los sujetos y rentas comprendidas, y las situaciones no deseadas que entran en su ámbito de incidencia. Finalmente, se comentan los problemas de doble imposición que la disposición genera, discutiendo algunas fórmulas legales que podrían emplearse para mitigar los mismos.

Discrimination concerning taxpayers is often found in every tax system, which allows double tax burden to happen. It is for this reason that agreements such as the Double Taxation conventions and the Andean Community Resolution 578 arise, which refer to the non discrimination principle. In the following article, the author proposes a new way to interpret this non-discrimination principle contained in the Andean Community Resolution 578, analyzing Peru's context and legislation in order to determine how to solve this problem when, for example, there is a differentiated treatment and a consequent unfair taxation to those who domicile abroad.

This article addresses the treatment of income obtained by directors, members of boards and management bodies of companies domiciled in the country. The particular source rule that our Income Tax Law contemplates for said subjects, when they act abroad in the exercise of their functions, is analyzed. In the first place, the origins of the provision and the reasons that would have been had to broaden the connection criterion are addressed. Then, its scope of application is revised, with emphasis on the subjects and incomes included, and the unwanted situations that fall within its scope of incidence. Finally, the double taxation problems that the provision generates are comment, discussing some legal formulas that could be used to mitigate them.

No description

This article addresses the subject of secondary adjustment on transfer pricing, focusing on its nature and its regulation in Peru. To do this, the author explains the concept and purpose of transfer pricing and also elaborates some terminological precisions concerning adjustments on transfer pricing, defining the primary adjustments, the compensating ones, the correlative ones and, in more depth, the secondary ones. Likewise, the author explains the way secondary adjustments of transfer prices are regulated by the Peruvian Income Tax Law.