Through this research, first a review of the definition of a museum is made, as well as its legal classification. Subsequently, the legislation on copyright applicable to museums is analyzed in order to determine the current possibilities of virtualization of the works that they have in on-site exhibition. Upon verifying the existing problems, the need for a new limitation or exception to the economic rights of author is raised to encourage the reproduction and public communication of works by museums and private collections to promote access to culture.

Through this research, first a review of the definition of a museum is made, as well as its legal classification. Subsequently, the legislation on copyright applicable to museums is analyzed in order to determine the current possibilities of virtualization of the works that they have in on-site exhibition. Upon verifying the existing problems, the need for a new limitation or exception to the economic rights of author is raised to encourage the reproduction and public communication of works by museums and private collections to promote access to culture.

Based on the recent damage done to the murals in the Centre of Lima, this article analyzes the conflict that can occur between the moral right of authors to the integrity of their work and the property rights of the holders of the support containing the intellectual creation. Criteria are provided to analyze conflicts in which murals are involved. Finally, the infringement of moral right of integrity is discussed.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

Based on the recent damage done to the murals in the Centre of Lima, this article analyzes the conflict that can occur between the moral right of authors to the integrity of their work and the property rights of the holders of the support containing the intellectual creation. Criteria are provided to analyze conflicts in which murals are involved. Finally, the infringement of moral right of integrity is discussed.

No contiene resumen

El artículo no presenta resumen.

Based on the recent damage done to the murals in the Centre of Lima, this article analyzes the conflict that can occur between the moral right of authors to the integrity of their work and the property rights of the holders of the support containing the intellectual creation. Criteria are provided to analyze conflicts in which murals are involved. Finally, the infringement of moral right of integrity is discussed.

Through this research, first a review of the definition of a museum is made, as well as its legal classification. Subsequently, the legislation on copyright applicable to museums is analyzed in order to determine the current possibilities of virtualization of the works that they have in on-site exhibition. Upon verifying the existing problems, the need for a new limitation or exception to the economic rights of author is raised to encourage the reproduction and public communication of works by museums and private collections to promote access to culture.

This article takes an approach to parody and its implications for intellectual property law, with a particular focus on copyright and trademark law, highlighting the relevance of its scope in the context of freedom of expression. Within this framework, the authors address the main debates on parody in both the continental intellectual property system and the North American copyright system. On the basis of this analysis, they evaluate the problem in the Peruvian context, where they highlight the progress made in copyright law, but also point out the existing deficiencies. Consequently, this work provides relevant criteria that allow us to understand the scope and limitations of parody in relation to intellectual property rights and freedom of expression.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

This article takes an approach to parody and its implications for intellectual property law, with a particular focus on copyright and trademark law, highlighting the relevance of its scope in the context of freedom of expression. Within this framework, the authors address the main debates on parody in both the continental intellectual property system and the North American copyright system. On the basis of this analysis, they evaluate the problem in the Peruvian context, where they highlight the progress made in copyright law, but also point out the existing deficiencies. Consequently, this work provides relevant criteria that allow us to understand the scope and limitations of parody in relation to intellectual property rights and freedom of expression.