The question of what the human dimension is, contains a great complexity, however, the modernity tries to respond in a simple way from a logic of having, that is to say, the man is measured by the level of his revenues. The search of new ways to know human´s dimension, allows to rediscover him in Aristotle´s act conception and its updating in Amartya Sen´s human capacities theory, a different focus that offers a much deeper answer from a being´s logical point of view. Nevertheless, to measure the human capacity is extremely difficult because it is an intangible one. This research is looking for the Hegelian idea of the objectivity, of the subjectivity for work, a starting point to level the difficulty and complement it with the classification of Abraham Maslow´s needs.

It aims to provide the manager, in his capacity as the leader of an organization that produces goods or services for society, an analytical instrument that allows him to decompose the most complex external factor: the political variable, understood as power relations, the interaction of social groups with different or antagonistic interests, and decision-making by socially powerful subjects that affects the whole. To approach the compression of this variable, an analytical instrument is proposed which combines four dimensions: contradiction between capital and labor, contradiction between State and civil society, contradiction between violence and peace and national contradiction (between protectionism and globalization or between nationalism and internationalism). Other dimensions are conceivable; however, what is important is the usefulness of the analytical method for the stated purpo...

The question of what the human dimension is, contains a great complexity, however, the modernity tries to respond in a simple way from a logic of having, that is to say, the man is measured by the level of his revenues. The search of new ways to know human´s dimension, allows to rediscover him in Aristotle´s act conception and its updating in Amartya Sen´s human capacities theory, a different focus that offers a much deeper answer from a being´s logical point of view. Nevertheless, to measure the human capacity is extremely difficult because it is an intangible one. This research is looking for the Hegelian idea of the objectivity, of the subjectivity for work, a starting point to level the difficulty and complement it with the classification of Abraham Maslow´s needs.

It aims to provide the manager, in his capacity as the leader of an organization that produces goods or services for society, an analytical instrument that allows him to decompose the most complex external factor: the political variable, understood as power relations, the interaction of social groups with different or antagonistic interests, and decision-making by socially powerful subjects that affects the whole. To approach the compression of this variable, an analytical instrument is proposed which combines four dimensions: contradiction between capital and labor, contradiction between State and civil society, contradiction between violence and peace and national contradiction (between protectionism and globalization or between nationalism and internationalism). Other dimensions are conceivable; however, what is important is the usefulness of the analytical method for the stated purpo...