Análisis de la  reforma procesal penal en el sentido del cambio en el sistema, y la instauración de nuevas formas y contenidos en la resolución de los conflictos penales.

This paper develops the main pragmatic contributions brought by the implementation of the new Criminal Procedure Code. It also analyzes the problems regarding its implementation. The model that preceded the criminal procedure reform was a model of inquisitive process, where the judge was the main actor. With the arrival of the new Code of Criminal Procedure, the role of prosecutors and the Public Ministry acquires greater relevance, being these the ones in charge of the investigation in its entirety. The author establishes the following as contributions of the new Criminal Procedure Code: i) the interdiction of multiple criminal prosecution, ii) the delimitation of the performance of justice operators, iii) the functions of the National Police of Peru are established, iv ) the delimitation of jurisdictional bodies, v) the regulation of procedural costs and vi) establishes a new regulatio...

This paper develops the main pragmatic contributions brought by the implementation of the new Criminal Procedure Code. It also analyzes the problems regarding its implementation. The model that preceded the criminal procedure reform was a model of inquisitive process, where the judge was the main actor. With the arrival of the new Code of Criminal Procedure, the role of prosecutors and the Public Ministry acquires greater relevance, being these the ones in charge of the investigation in its entirety. The author establishes the following as contributions of the new Criminal Procedure Code: i) the interdiction of multiple criminal prosecution, ii) the delimitation of the performance of justice operators, iii) the functions of the National Police of Peru are established, iv ) the delimitation of jurisdictional bodies, v) the regulation of procedural costs and vi) establishes a new regulatio...