The increase in the rates of complaints for intrafamily violence is a reflection of the levels of conflict among those who make it up, the most affected part being the children, who in turn become the reason for disputes between the parents over their possession, visits and food, generating acts of violence between parents that have repercussions on the children, in view of which, it is the role of judges to proactively assume the issuance not only of the protection measures provided by law, but also of precautionary measures on those points in dispute and that should be resolved on the merits with the urgency of the case and with the guarantees of due process before the competent court. The experience that is shared is framed within that purpose of guaranteeing in the best way the protection of victims, access to justice and the cessation of violence.

This study analyzes some cases when the defendant is obligated to realize the DNA paternity testing into the context to determinate the identity of the child into judicial process. The different legal reforms in the Extramarital Paternity Judicial Filiation Process have created changes in compliance with the law: now, once again, the plaintiff filed the lawsuit and notified him, ten days later, the DNA test will be paid and performed by the accused. Only this test serves to determine his innocence: if he did not take the test, the court will declare paternity However, despite the legal reforms mentioned the problem respect to determinate the paternity persists: opposing the declaration of paternity is insufficient. Cases in which the accused does not take the necessary steps to obtain the biological evidence are analyzed. For example, the failure to pay for  the test within the expe...

This study analyzes some cases when the defendant is obligated to realize the DNA paternity testing into the context to determinate the identity of the child into judicial process. The different legal reforms in the Extramarital Paternity Judicial Filiation Process have created changes in compliance with the law: now, once again, the plaintiff filed the lawsuit and notified him, ten days later, the DNA test will be paid and performed by the accused. Only this test serves to determine his innocence: if he did not take the test, the court will declare paternity However, despite the legal reforms mentioned the problem respect to determinate the paternity persists: opposing the declaration of paternity is insufficient. Cases in which the accused does not take the necessary steps to obtain the biological evidence are analyzed. For example, the failure to pay for  the test within the expe...