The legal transplant is one of the legislative techniques most used by the legislator, so its analysis and development during its application is very important. Similarly, the use of precedents is a particular feature of various legal systems of civil law, because of this, the analysis of this institution, its foundation and its importance for the law are relevant.In this article, the author seeks to analyze and explain the development of a legal transplant in its new environment, together with the impact of various alterations in it and the conservation of it. It also seeks to analyze the function of the precedent and demonstrate that the use of it in civil law legal systems is not analogous to the powers of the legislator, but, on the contrary, rationalizes the decision making and contributes to materialize many principles and constitutional rights.

The legal transplant is one of the legislative techniques most used by the legislator, so its analysis and development during its application is very important. Similarly, the use of precedents is a particular feature of various legal systems of civil law, because of this, the analysis of this institution, its foundation and its importance for the law are relevant.In this article, the author seeks to analyze and explain the development of a legal transplant in its new environment, together with the impact of various alterations in it and the conservation of it. It also seeks to analyze the function of the precedent and demonstrate that the use of it in civil law legal systems is not analogous to the powers of the legislator, but, on the contrary, rationalizes the decision making and contributes to materialize many principles and constitutional rights.

The legal transplant is one of the legislative techniques most used by the legislator, so its analysis and development during its application is very important. Similarly, the use of precedents is a particular feature of various legal systems of civil law, because of this, the analysis of this institution, its foundation and its importance for the law are relevant.In this article, the author seeks to analyze and explain the development of a legal transplant in its new environment, together with the impact of various alterations in it and the conservation of it. It also seeks to analyze the function of the precedent and demonstrate that the use of it in civil law legal systems is not analogous to the powers of the legislator, but, on the contrary, rationalizes the decision making and contributes to materialize many principles and constitutional rights.

With the enforcement of Law 30364, the Peruvian State complies with adapting national legislation to the parameters set by the Inter-American Convention to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Women (Convention of Belém do Pará). In this context, the present work critically analyzes whether protection orders constitute a simple, fast and effective remedy against gender violence. To this end, it is reasoned about the fundamentals and nature of the protection orders, as well as the probative activity necessary for its granting. From this, it is affirmed that the guardianship granted by the protection orders is a preventive inhibitory guardianship.

Con la puesta en vigencia del Código Procesal Constitucional se introdujo al sistema jurídico peruano la figura del precedente constitucional vinculante. A la luz de dicha regulación, el Tribunal Constitucional ha emitido un sin número de precedentes vinculantes, los cuales demuestran ausencia de racionalidad en la formación de estos, principalmente por los siguientes aspectos: formación abstracta del precedente constitucional, esto es, un precedente creado al margen de los hechos del caso concreto; y a partir de la ausencia de conexión entre el precedente y los hechos, se fijan como extremos vinculantes aquellos razonamientos que no son la ratio decidendi. Bajo este contexto, cabe preguntarse: ¿Es racional el modus operandi del Tribunal Constitucional en la formación e identificación del precedente constitucional? ¿Se pueden interpretar los artículos VI y VII del Título Pre...

Con la puesta en vigencia del Código Procesal Constitucional se introdujo al sistema jurídico peruano la figura del precedente constitucional vinculante. A la luz de dicha regulación, el Tribunal Constitucional ha emitido un sin número de precedentes vinculantes, los cuales demuestran ausencia de racionalidad en la formación de estos, principalmente por los siguientes aspectos: formación abstracta del precedente constitucional, esto es, un precedente creado al margen de los hechos del caso concreto; y a partir de la ausencia de conexión entre el precedente y los hechos, se fijan como extremos vinculantes aquellos razonamientos que no son la ratio decidendi. Bajo este contexto, cabe preguntarse: ¿Es racional el modus operandi del Tribunal Constitucional en la formación e identificación del precedente constitucional? ¿Se pueden interpretar los artículos VI y VII del Título Pre...

With the enforcement of Law 30364, the Peruvian State complies with adapting national legislation to the parameters set by the Inter-American Convention to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Women (Convention of Belém do Pará). In this context, the present work critically analyzes whether protection orders constitute a simple, fast and effective remedy against gender violence. To this end, it is reasoned about the fundamentals and nature of the protection orders, as well as the probative activity necessary for its granting. From this, it is affirmed that the guardianship granted by the protection orders is a preventive inhibitory guardianship.

With the enforcement of Law 30364, the Peruvian State complies with adapting national legislation to the parameters set by the Inter-American Convention to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Women (Convention of Belém do Pará). In this context, the present work critically analyzes whether protection orders constitute a simple, fast and effective remedy against gender violence. To this end, it is reasoned about the fundamentals and nature of the protection orders, as well as the probative activity necessary for its granting. From this, it is affirmed that the guardianship granted by the protection orders is a preventive inhibitory guardianship.