No description

In this essay the author highlights the importance of the role of the principle of due process of law, understood as a requirement of procedural legality, which orients the interpretation of procedural norms in order to avoid innovative interpretations that could subvert the procedural rules.

No presenta resumen

The author critically analyzes the prevailing relationship between comparative civil procedure and the positivist method. He argues that the prominence of the principle of legality within civil procedure, combined with its conception as an ideologically neutral instrument, has reduced legal comparison to a mere description of foreign rules and institutions. In contrast, the author emphasizes the importance of methodological pluralism in approaching comparative civil procedure, highlighting the link between the aims of the comparison and the method employed.

No description