No presenta resumen

Conmemorando los ochenta años de la muerte de Giuseppe Chiovenda, el artículo analiza su aporte en la formación de la escuela procesal italiana, la recepción de sus ideas en Latinoamérica, su visión sobre la jurisdicción y la acción así como su pensamiento sobre el proceso oral.

Access to appeal in models compared with a dogmatic method and a compared one in Germany, United Kingdom, France and Italy is important since members of these systems wrote the draft of the ELI/Unidroit project. The objective of this project is to lay the foundations for the harmonization of the civil process for Europe. This way, it aims to describe each national model, analyze it and, then, at the end of the text, compare it with the mentioned project and the main trends in the matter. This contribution is mainly nourished by comparative legal contributions related to access and the filters of appeal, such as the casting of it as a center, and it’s not intended to cover other aspects of the work in progress. We will see that many aspects that already govern civil processes such as German and Italian are incorporated as proposals. Therefore, the idea is to take stock of the criticisms...

Cuando hablamos de tutela jurisdiccional efectiva, pensamos en todos lo que todo proceso debe tener para ser calificado como válido y justo, pero ¿este principio se puede aplicar para la etapa ejecutoria del proceso? Ello pues muchas veces quienes ganan un juicio no pueden ver satisfecha su pretensión en tanto la otra parte se niega a cumplir con la ejecución de la sentencia, encontrándose en una situación de desamparo. En el presente artículo, el autor, partiendo de entender este derecho dentro de la ejecución de las sentencias, nos muestra cuál esla situación tanto en la legislación chilena como en la europea.

Chiovenda was born in Premosello on February 2, 1872. He studied law at the University of Rome between 1899 and 1893, Vittorio Scialoja was a important influence pursuing that Italian procedural science was in a state of abandonment that needed attention and urged in that sense.From positive law, history, contact with overwhelming German science and aware of the lethargic Spanish and French doctrine encouraged Chiovenda to a comparative and integral formation from the dogmatic and historical.

Access to appeal in models compared with a dogmatic method and a compared one in Germany, United Kingdom, France and Italy is important since members of these systems wrote the draft of the ELI/Unidroit project. The objective of this project is to lay the foundations for the harmonization of the civil process for Europe. This way, it aims to describe each national model, analyze it and, then, at the end of the text, compare it with the mentioned project and the main trends in the matter. This contribution is mainly nourished by comparative legal contributions related to access and the filters of appeal, such as the casting of it as a center, and it’s not intended to cover other aspects of the work in progress. We will see that many aspects that already govern civil processes such as German and Italian are incorporated as proposals. Therefore, the idea is to take stock of the criticisms...

Chiovenda was born in Premosello on February 2, 1872. He studied law at the University of Rome between 1899 and 1893, Vittorio Scialoja was a important influence pursuing that Italian procedural science was in a state of abandonment that needed attention and urged in that sense.From positive law, history, contact with overwhelming German science and aware of the lethargic Spanish and French doctrine encouraged Chiovenda to a comparative and integral formation from the dogmatic and historical.

No presenta resumen

Cuando hablamos de tutela jurisdiccional efectiva, pensamos en todos lo que todo proceso debe tener para ser calificado como válido y justo, pero ¿este principio se puede aplicar para la etapa ejecutoria del proceso? Ello pues muchas veces quienes ganan un juicio no pueden ver satisfecha su pretensión en tanto la otra parte se niega a cumplir con la ejecución de la sentencia, encontrándose en una situación de desamparo. En el presente artículo, el autor, partiendo de entender este derecho dentro de la ejecución de las sentencias, nos muestra cuál esla situación tanto en la legislación chilena como en la europea.

Chiovenda was born in Premosello on February 2, 1872. He studied law at the University of Rome between 1899 and 1893, Vittorio Scialoja was a important influence pursuing that Italian procedural science was in a state of abandonment that needed attention and urged in that sense.From positive law, history, contact with overwhelming German science and aware of the lethargic Spanish and French doctrine encouraged Chiovenda to a comparative and integral formation from the dogmatic and historical.

Access to appeal in models compared with a dogmatic method and a compared one in Germany, United Kingdom, France and Italy is important since members of these systems wrote the draft of the ELI/Unidroit project. The objective of this project is to lay the foundations for the harmonization of the civil process for Europe. This way, it aims to describe each national model, analyze it and, then, at the end of the text, compare it with the mentioned project and the main trends in the matter. This contribution is mainly nourished by comparative legal contributions related to access and the filters of appeal, such as the casting of it as a center, and it’s not intended to cover other aspects of the work in progress. We will see that many aspects that already govern civil processes such as German and Italian are incorporated as proposals. Therefore, the idea is to take stock of the criticisms...

No presenta resumen

No description

No contiene resumen

No description

Los doctores Berizonce y Pérez Ragone —sin dejar de referirse a los sistemas de justicia de sus países: Argentina y Chile respectivamente— comparten su opinión respecto a la eficiencia de los sistemas judiciales de Iberoamérica y la idoneidad en la función de sus principales operadores, denunciando los problemas vigentes, planteando los retos y marcando las pautas que sirvan a una adecuada reforma procesal en el Perú y los países vecinos.

Los doctores Berizonce y Pérez Ragone —sin dejar de referirse a los sistemas de justicia de sus países: Argentina y Chile respectivamente— comparten su opinión respecto a la eficiencia de los sistemas judiciales de Iberoamérica y la idoneidad en la función de sus principales operadores, denunciando los problemas vigentes, planteando los retos y marcando las pautas que sirvan a una adecuada reforma procesal en el Perú y los países vecinos.

Los doctores Berizonce y Pérez Ragone —sin dejar de referirse a los sistemas de justicia de sus países: Argentina y Chile respectivamente— comparten su opinión respecto a la eficiencia de los sistemas judiciales de Iberoamérica y la idoneidad en la función de sus principales operadores, denunciando los problemas vigentes, planteando los retos y marcando las pautas que sirvan a una adecuada reforma procesal en el Perú y los países vecinos.