This article analyzes the content of the judgment Elgo Rios, to see if really that judgment represents a change of direction before the criteria handled by the Constitutional Court. This will explain the implications of procedural rules implemented for the recruitment in the private system over the previous precedent governing the origin of labor protection, that is, the judgment on the record 206-2005-PA, the precedent Baylon.

This article analyzes the content of the judgment Elgo Rios, to see if really that judgment represents a change of direction before the criteria handled by the Constitutional Court. This will explain the implications of procedural rules implemented for the recruitment in the private system over the previous precedent governing the origin of labor protection, that is, the judgment on the record 206-2005-PA, the precedent Baylon.

La presente investigación versa sobre el arbitraje potestativo como mecanismo de resolución de conflictos económicos, institución controvertida que se encuentra en permanente evolución, mediante modificaciones normativas como a través de los laudos que emitidos en su práctica. Con la promulgación del Decreto Supremo No. 014-2011-TR, que modifica el artículo 61° de la Ley de Relaciones Colectivas de Trabajo (LCRT), se formaliza el establecimiento del arbitraje potestativo, abriendo paso a una nueva discusión: ¿el arbitraje potestativo del artículo 61º es de origen causado o incausado? A partir de este contexto, es necesario realizar un análisis constitucional y crítico que reafirme la naturaleza potestativa e incausada del arbitraje contemplado en la LRCT, así como resaltar algunos problemas prácticos en su procedimiento y, a su vez, proponer soluciones para ellos. El tr...

La presente investigación versa sobre el arbitraje potestativo como mecanismo de resolución de conflictos económicos, institución controvertida que se encuentra en permanente evolución, mediante modificaciones normativas como a través de los laudos que emitidos en su práctica. Con la promulgación del Decreto Supremo No. 014-2011-TR, que modifica el artículo 61° de la Ley de Relaciones Colectivas de Trabajo (LCRT), se formaliza el establecimiento del arbitraje potestativo, abriendo paso a una nueva discusión: ¿el arbitraje potestativo del artículo 61º es de origen causado o incausado? A partir de este contexto, es necesario realizar un análisis constitucional y crítico que reafirme la naturaleza potestativa e incausada del arbitraje contemplado en la LRCT, así como resaltar algunos problemas prácticos en su procedimiento y, a su vez, proponer soluciones para ellos. El tr...

This article analyzes the content of the judgment Elgo Rios, to see if really that judgment represents a change of direction before the criteria handled by the Constitutional Court. This will explain the implications of procedural rules implemented for the recruitment in the private system over the previous precedent governing the origin of labor protection, that is, the judgment on the record 206-2005-PA, the precedent Baylon.

This article addresses the issue about the application of Facultative Arbitration and its effect on the redirection of negotiable behaviors of business and gremials organizations in order to achieve some previous agreement before they submitted to an arbitral tribunal. Furthermore, the authors compare the effects of the strike concept variation on the qualification of this like legal or illegal and its relationship with the emergence of Facultative Arbitration that, as an exceptional measure, complement the collective negotiation.

This article addresses the issue about the application of Facultative Arbitration and its effect on the redirection of negotiable behaviors of business and gremials organizations in order to achieve some previous agreement before they submitted to an arbitral tribunal. Furthermore, the authors compare the effects of the strike concept variation on the qualification of this like legal or illegal and its relationship with the emergence of Facultative Arbitration that, as an exceptional measure, complement the collective negotiation.

This article addresses the issue about the application of Facultative Arbitration and its effect on the redirection of negotiable behaviors of business and gremials organizations in order to achieve some previous agreement before they submitted to an arbitral tribunal. Furthermore, the authors compare the effects of the strike concept variation on the qualification of this like legal or illegal and its relationship with the emergence of Facultative Arbitration that, as an exceptional measure, complement the collective negotiation.