Contemporary liberal democratic societies are marked by complexity and the fact of pluralism and diverse visions of goods. How to articulate them, and how to provide solutions to conflicts? The current predominant perspective of liberal theory does so through the proposal of consensual possibilities; but from this perspective a problem arises: can there be consensus without prejudice to democratic practices and political action, which is an essential mark of a plural society, and which presupposes the non-exclusion of the other and equality as a constitutional foundation? Faced with this issue, there is a need to (re)think practices of expression of the plural, not excluding conflict, articulatory aspects and recognition of the different, as it marks a plural society, and its reflexes in the construction of a public space as a space for the expression of diversity and conflict, and,...

As sociedades democráticas contemporâneas liberais são marcadas pela complexidade e pelo fato do pluralismo e visões diversas de bens. Como articulá-las, e como dar soluções aos conflitos? A perspectiva predominante atual da teoria liberal o faz por meio da proposta de possibilidades consensuais; mas desta perspectiva deriva uma problemática: pode haver consenso sem prejuízos a práticas democráticas e à ação política, que é marca essencial à sociedade plural, e que pressupõe a não exclusão do outro e da igualdade como fundamento constitucional? Diante desta problemática se impõe a necessidade de (re)pensar práticas de expressão do plural, não excludente do conflito, de aspectos articulatórios e do reconhecimento do diferente, vez que marca de uma sociedade plural, e de seus reflexos na construção de um espaço público como espaço de expressão do diverso e d...

Contemporary liberal democratic societies are marked by complexity and the fact of pluralism and diverse visions of goods. How to articulate them, and how to provide solutions to conflicts? The current predominant perspective of liberal theory does so through the proposal of consensual possibilities; but from this perspective a problem arises: can there be consensus without prejudice to democratic practices and political action, which is an essential mark of a plural society, and which presupposes the non-exclusion of the other and equality as a constitutional foundation? Faced with this issue, there is a need to (re)think practices of expression of the plural, not excluding conflict, articulatory aspects and recognition of the different, as it marks a plural society, and its reflexes in the construction of a public space as a space for the expression of diversity and conflict, and,...