The purpose of the investigation is to demonstrate the influence of the regulatory framework on the omission of pecuniary sanctions in the seizure of money by cross-border transport. To this end, a basic, mixed investigation was carried out, at the explanatory level, having selected as sample 163 cases of interventions in the Santa Rosa border attention center and documentary analysis cards were applied to collect the information. The qualitative results on the regulatory framework show that Law 28306 has undergone modifications and substantial variations between 2004 and 2016; the D.L. 1249 that regulates the transfer of cross-border money, does not contemplate the cases in which the seizure of money corresponds, precautionary measure ordered by the prosecutor. There is no objective criterion to choose between the figure of retention (customs) or seizure (prosecutor's office). Case 265-...

The purpose of the investigation is to demonstrate the influence of the regulatory framework on the omission of pecuniary sanctions in the seizure of money by cross-border transport. To this end, a basic, mixed investigation was carried out, at the explanatory level, having selected as sample 163 cases of interventions in the Santa Rosa border attention center and documentary analysis cards were applied to collect the information. The qualitative results on the regulatory framework show that Law 28306 has undergone modifications and substantial variations between 2004 and 2016; the D.L. 1249 that regulates the transfer of cross-border money, does not contemplate the cases in which the seizure of money corresponds, precautionary measure ordered by the prosecutor. There is no objective criterion to choose between the figure of retention (customs) or seizure (prosecutor's office). Case 265-...

The purpose of the investigation is to demonstrate the influence of the regulatory framework on the omission of pecuniary sanctions in the seizure of money by cross-border transport. To this end, a basic, mixed investigation was carried out, at the explanatory level, having selected as sample 163 cases of interventions in the Santa Rosa border attention center and documentary analysis cards were applied to collect the information. The qualitative results on the regulatory framework show that Law 28306 has undergone modifications and substantial variations between 2004 and 2016; the D.L. 1249 that regulates the transfer of cross-border money, does not contemplate the cases in which the seizure of money corresponds, precautionary measure ordered by the prosecutor. There is no objective criterion to choose between the figure of retention (customs) or seizure (prosecutor's office). Case 265-...