En este actual e innovador artículo, Miguel Morachimo nos ofrece un análisis sobre las implicancias de la prestación de servicios catalogados como “Economías de pares”. En este sentido, en un primer momento, da a conocer la razón de la acogida de estos servicios en el público usuario y luego se encarga de esbozar los problemas regulatorios que en la experiencia comparada y nacional se han ido suscitando. Finalmente, propone que el hecho de que este tipo de servicios no estén adscritos al marco regulatorio convencional no implica que su funcionamiento tenga bajos estándares de calidad, ni que puedan estar exentos de fiscalización.

Este artículo documenta la evolución de la regulación del Principio de Neutralidad de Red en el Derecho peruano durante la última década, a través de un estudio detallado de las diversas normas que han integrado su marco regulatorio. Desde sus orígenes casi accidentales hasta el reciente Reglamento publicado por OSIPTEL en 2016, este trabajo destaca la ausencia de un claro y consistente objetivo regulatorio detrás de estos esfuerzos.

This paper documents the evolution of the Network Neutrality Principle regulation in Peruvian Law during the last decade, through a detailed study of the several laws that have built it. Since their almost accidental beginnings to the recently published Regulation by OSIPTEL in 2016, this work highlights the lack of a clear and consistent regulatory objective behind these efforts.

This paper documents the evolution of the Network Neutrality Principle regulation in Peruvian Law during the last decade, through a detailed study of the several laws that have built it. Since their almost accidental beginnings to the recently published Regulation by OSIPTEL in 2016, this work highlights the lack of a clear and consistent regulatory objective behind these efforts.

The law regarding protection of public servants’ data in government-owned servers is ambiguous and could even be considered unconstitutional. The authors develop ideas with which they argue if information, messages and communications inside government-owned servers should be accessible to the public, by virtue of the right to information.

The law regarding protection of public servants’ data in government-owned servers is ambiguous and could even be considered unconstitutional. The authors develop ideas with which they argue if information, messages and communications inside government-owned servers should be accessible to the public, by virtue of the right to information.

The law regarding protection of public servants’ data in government-owned servers is ambiguous and could even be considered unconstitutional. The authors develop ideas with which they argue if information, messages and communications inside government-owned servers should be accessible to the public, by virtue of the right to information.