The thinking has been defined as it happens in a different dimension from the objective dimension. The thinking would be formal for internal processes unable to be observed. This methodological block was over for the theories of Skinner and Vigotsky. The first one proposed the introduction of objective stimuli in the responses chains of the Thinking process. Vigotsky remarked the slow intervention of tools in the structuration of the thinking behavior, meanly the language. However, these definitions describe the Thinking as an 'stimuli autogeneration' , with many similarities to the internal stimuli of the cognitive definitions. Kantor defined the thinking as the manipulation of implicit and over (responses, but the concept of 'manipulation' reminds mentalistic points of view. Ribes points that the thinking is a special type of relation in which participates the behavior. 'H e describes ...

The thinking has been defined as it happens in a different dimension from the objective dimension. The thinking would be formal for internal processes unable to be observed. This methodological block was over for the theories of Skinner and Vigotsky. The first one proposed the introduction of objective stimuli in the responses chains of the Thinking process. Vigotsky remarked the slow intervention of tools in the structuration of the thinking behavior, meanly the language. However, these definitions describe the Thinking as an 'stimuli autogeneration' , with many similarities to the internal stimuli of the cognitive definitions. Kantor defined the thinking as the manipulation of implicit and over (responses, but the concept of 'manipulation' reminds mentalistic points of view. Ribes points that the thinking is a special type of relation in which participates the behavior. 'H e describes ...