Implant-supported restorations have shown remarkable progress in recent years and have demonstrated high sur vival rates of up to 95% with well-documented functional and esthetic results [1, 2]. Classically, implant-supported restorations can be cement-retained or screw-retained. Al though both methods have potential uses, the ideal option has yet to be established, and the selection depends on retrievability and esthetic factors [3]. Depending on the retention method, the success of the implant rehabilitation is not free of complications and re quires dynamic equilibrium between implant osseointe gration and technical and biological factors. However, based on current findings, the main complications of dental im plants are produced by biological factors [4, 5]. Furthermore, Hindawi International Journal of Dentistry Volume 2021, Article ID 9950972, 7 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9...