The task undertaken in this essay is to analyze the interpretation of the legal norms in order to be used in the solution of the cases brought before the judge. However, many of the theoretical constructs elaborated to explain it not only seem to be completely removed from the activity that the judges perform in the day to day of the exercise of their works, but, in addition, they are elaborated in an abstruse and vaporous language that evil could be compared with the practice of law. The objective of this essay is to try to specify clearly and concisely the parameters established by private law for the judicial interpretation of the rules, highlighting the broad powers available to the judges, but without leaving aside the limits that must respect.

La tarea emprendida en este ensayo consiste en analizar la interpretación de las normas jurídicas a fin de ser utilizadas en la solución de los casos puestos en conocimiento del juez. Sin embargo, muchas de las construcciones teóricas elaboradas para explicarla no sólo parecen encontrarse completamente alejadas de la actividad que realizan los jueces en el día a día del ejercicio de sus labores, sino que, además, están elaboradas en un lenguaje abstruso y vaporoso que mal podría comparecerse con la práctica del Derecho. El objetivo de este ensayo es tratar de precisar de forma clara y concisa los parámetros que establece el Derecho privado para la interpretación judicial de las normas, resaltando las amplias facultades de las que disponen los jueces, pero, sin dejar de lado los límites que deben respetar.

The more and more recurrent application of constitutional norms in the deprived Right, and more indeed, in the particular relations that a part of the doctrine has called to constitutionalize of the deprived right, nevertheless does not constitute an absolutely accurate expression when not expressing with exactitude the way how these norms are applicable to private relations. Aware of that, the author makes some precisions on which he understands by constitutionalize, afterwards, he approaches to the concept of the application of the constitutional principles with the purpose of highlighting the darkness of the language of the contemporary constitutional right hidden by complex theories whose purpose is not more than to create an appearance of objectivity, justice and scientific rigor that confers to the decisions of the constitutional judges the cuasi incontrovertible

The more and more recurrent application of constitutional norms in the deprived Right, and more indeed, in the particular relations that a part of the doctrine has called to constitutionalize of the deprived right, nevertheless does not constitute an absolutely accurate expression when not expressing with exactitude the way how these norms are applicable to private relations. Aware of that, the author makes some precisions on which he understands by constitutionalize, afterwards, he approaches to the concept of the application of the constitutional principles with the purpose of highlighting the darkness of the language of the contemporary constitutional right hidden by complex theories whose purpose is not more than to create an appearance of objectivity, justice and scientific rigor that confers to the decisions of the constitutional judges the cuasi incontrovertible