The objective was to determine the legal assumptions and effects of extension of the arbitration agreement to non-signatories, included in article 14 of the Peruvian Arbitration Law (DL1071). The type of investigation was dogmatic legal. Principales results: There is no consensus among jurists regarding the content of article 14 of the LAP.The jurisdiction Arbitration is exceptional, consecrated in the Political Constitution of 1993 and has its origin and limitations in article 139. The Peruvian Arbitration Law regulated by Legislative Decree No. 1071, has a monist character since its scope of application is national and international. Conclusion: The extension of the arbitration agreement rests on the substantial part that is the owner of the contractual interests, even if it has not signed the agreement, and is legitimately constituted in part.

The objective was to determine the legal assumptions and effects of extension of the arbitration agreement to non-signatories, included in article 14 of the Peruvian Arbitration Law (DL1071). The type of investigation was dogmatic legal. Principales results: There is no consensus among jurists regarding the content of article 14 of the LAP.The jurisdiction Arbitration is exceptional, consecrated in the Political Constitution of 1993 and has its origin and limitations in article 139. The Peruvian Arbitration Law regulated by Legislative Decree No. 1071, has a monist character since its scope of application is national and international. Conclusion: The extension of the arbitration agreement rests on the substantial part that is the owner of the contractual interests, even if it has not signed the agreement, and is legitimately constituted in part.

El objetivo se centró en determinar los supuestos y efectos jurídicos de extensión del convenio arbitral a no signatarios, consignado en el artículo 14° de la Ley de Arbitraje Peruana (D.L.1071.) El tipo de investigación fue dogmático jurídico. Principales resultados: No existe consenso entre juristas respecto al contenido del artículo 14° de la LAP. La jurisdicción arbitral es excepcional, consagrada en la Constitución Política de 1993 y tiene su origen y limitaciones en el artículo 139. La Ley de Arbitraje Peruana regulada por el Decreto Legislativo N° 1071, tiene un carácter monista ya que su ámbito de aplicación es nacional e internacional. Conclusión: La extensión del convenio arbitral recae sobre la parte sustancial que es titular de los intereses contractuales, aunque no haya signado el convenio, constituyéndose legítimamente en parte

The objective was to determine the legal assumptions and effects of extension of the arbitration agreement to non-signatories, included in article 14 of the Peruvian Arbitration Law (DL1071). The type of investigation was dogmatic legal. Principales results: There is no consensus among jurists regarding the content of article 14 of the LAP.The jurisdiction Arbitration is exceptional, consecrated in the Political Constitution of 1993 and has its origin and limitations in article 139. The Peruvian Arbitration Law regulated by Legislative Decree No. 1071, has a monist character since its scope of application is national and international. Conclusion: The extension of the arbitration agreement rests on the substantial part that is the owner of the contractual interests, even if it has not signed the agreement, and is legitimately constituted in part.