With this work we want to make known, in what way the guilt and the typicality in Peru, consists in the imputation of an accustomed typified unlawfully. It is presumed that the existence of an unlawful act corresponds to an imputation trial. As it is understood the Antijuricidad and culpability, they are 2 pillars of which the theory of the crime is based. The distinction of both is key and the effects that they become very relevant, it is affirmative about the judgment that prevails the conduct and the typicity, since it refers to the fact, in the same way the trial both intervene in the crime, added to the behavior , and what varies is the penalty that this entails. Thus, that those involved in the same crime, the basis that identifies them is common to all. It follows that the sentence may be different, being a crime committed. It should be understood that there is a difference betwee...