This article reflects on the treaty-making power of the Congress and the President of the Republic in light of the Peruvian domestic law and International Law (particularly within the framework of the Vienna Convention of 1969 on the Law of Treaties) taking into account the discussions that arose betweenthe legislative and the executive powers regarding the ratification of the Extradition Treaty between Peru and France of 2016. The domestic law applicable to the conclusion of a treaty in Peru establishes that the President of the Republic is the only one who has the power to express the consent of the State to be bound by a treaty through ratification, which has internationallegal effects. The Congress has the power to approve treaties whose provisions are related to topics listed in Article 56 of 1993 Peruvian Constitution. The Congress’ legislative approval implies a parliamentary co...

El trabajo de Elvira Méndez recoge los aspectos más interesantes de la discusión parlamentaria sobre los alcances de la expresión «dar cuenta», que no debe ser entendida como mera información burocrática, sino como mecanismo que da lugar al control del Parlamento. A partir de allí el estudio se concentra en la Ley 25397 que reguló los actos normativos del Presidente de la República. Fui autor de uno de los proyectos de ley que sirvió de base para que la Comisión de Constitución del Senado elaborase la propuesta que luego se convirtió en ley. Desde esa posición de coautor de una de las leyes más importantes dadas por el Congreso en 1991 para cautelar la institucionalidad democrática del país, debo decir que el análisis e interpretación que Elvira Méndez hace de esa ley es acertado.

Este libro nos introduce al derecho romano a través de sus principales conceptos, reglas y principios. La jurisprudencia de la Roma antigua es la base de los ordenamientos jurídicos que forman parte de la familia romano-germánica. Por tanto, si queremos conocer mejor el derecho peruano y hacer aportes congruentes con sus raíces, no podemos dejar de lado el estudio e investigación del derecho romano.

This paper analyses the international obligation of solving disputes peacefully and the International Court of Justice role as a jurisdictional means of the United Nations in solving disputes. From this point, it analyses the Court role in the last years and its work solving territorial and maritime disputes, for example, the one between Peru and Chile. It presents an interesting study of the international obligations that led Peru and Chile solve the dispute peacefully and the advantages and disadvantages of it. Finally, it presents the main challenges that arise from turning to the International Court of Justice.

No description

No description

This article reflects on the treaty-making power of the Congress and the President of the Republic in light of the Peruvian domestic law and International Law (particularly within the framework of the Vienna Convention of 1969 on the Law of Treaties) taking into account the discussions that arose betweenthe legislative and the executive powers regarding the ratification of the Extradition Treaty between Peru and France of 2016. The domestic law applicable to the conclusion of a treaty in Peru establishes that the President of the Republic is the only one who has the power to express the consent of the State to be bound by a treaty through ratification, which has internationallegal effects. The Congress has the power to approve treaties whose provisions are related to topics listed in Article 56 of 1993 Peruvian Constitution. The Congress’ legislative approval implies a parliamentary co...

Article XXXI of Pact of Bogotá (1948) created the obligation for States parties to submit their disputes to the International Court of Justice “in conformity with” article 36 paragraph 2 of its Statute. In this regard, Honduras held the position that Article XXXI required each State party to make a declaration in accordance with its Statute in order to unilaterally bring the case to the International Court of Justice in the case concerning Border and transborder armed actions (Nicaragua v. Honduras). Then, a question arises: what is the relationship between these two articles? After analyzing international law, jurisprudence and doctrine, the conclusion is that these articles are not related to each other because they are two independent titles of jurisdiction whose differences are found in the source of the State consent, to whom they apply and the disputes that can be settled by t...

No contiene resumen

This paper analyses the international obligation of solving disputes peacefully and the International Court of Justice role as a jurisdictional means of the United Nations in solving disputes. From this point, it analyses the Court role in the last years and its work solving territorial and maritime disputes, for example, the one between Peru and Chile. It presents an interesting study of the international obligations that led Peru and Chile solve the dispute peacefully and the advantages and disadvantages of it. Finally, it presents the main challenges that arise from turning to the International Court of Justice.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

El artículo no presenta resumen.

No description

El artículo no presenta resumen.

No presenta resumen

No contiene resumen

Article XXXI of Pact of Bogotá (1948) created the obligation for States parties to submit their disputes to the International Court of Justice “in conformity with” article 36 paragraph 2 of its Statute. In this regard, Honduras held the position that Article XXXI required each State party to make a declaration in accordance with its Statute in order to unilaterally bring the case to the International Court of Justice in the case concerning Border and transborder armed actions (Nicaragua v. Honduras). Then, a question arises: what is the relationship between these two articles? After analyzing international law, jurisprudence and doctrine, the conclusion is that these articles are not related to each other because they are two independent titles of jurisdiction whose differences are found in the source of the State consent, to whom they apply and the disputes that can be settled by t...

El artículo no presenta resumen.

El artículo no presenta resumen.