La relación entre sociología y política durante el periodo comprendiendo entre los años sesenta y fines del siglo XX es el punto central del análisis del autor realiza en este articulo y para lo cual desarrolla algunas hipótesis explicativas, Una relación que es vista no solo en el aspecto académico sino también e su característica de acción practica. Sin reclamar ninguna imparcialidad llega a concluir que la sociología, a pesar de las tormentas, en la actualidad esta esforzándose por desarrollar enfoques interpretativos para el análisis de los fenómenos políticos y contribuir a la explicación de nuestra realidad cambiante

This papel' examines the COIl(;q)fS ofState. reform of the Suue and the processes ofpolitical democratization in Latiu Americe and Pe/'1I (J{ (he beginnins; of'the :} / si cent IIIT, 11 explores public opinion about the Peru+ian SWl(!, (he contradictions between State and market econotuy aud finallv propases threc processes: nationalizauon. dcmocratization (//1(1dcsprivtuizucion [FrITePeruvian Statc is to achievc htgi/il//üc\' as tlu: politicul authoritv ofthe citizens

The current article explains the relatinonship between the lack of State support, faculty mediocrity, democratic reason and technochratic reason in the Peruvian university in the last century. It presents the sequence of logic and conflict between the different discourses in the process of reform of higher education starting with the university movement in Córdoba, Argentina in 1918 to the present times. The article highlights the formation of democratic reason in the different moments of crisis and change in the university and states that this kind of reason is the possibility of giving a future to the production of knowledge in Peru.

This article addresses the counterpoint between the university and political power in Peru during the last hundred years. This power dispute, in the best and worst sense, will determine the course of this relationship. The university, mainly the public university, tries to position itself as a democratizing factor in the country while state power embraces changing attitudes: repression, abandonment, and privatization, to tame the rebellious and questioning impulses of university professionals. We analyze this issue focusing on the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, considering its tradition, importance, leadership, and decline. It is an unresolved counterpoint that continues among the many questions about the future of Peruvian democratization.

No description

No description

No description

This article places the origin and development of the Peruvian Right as a neoliberal right over the period 1990-2020. The study delves into the roots of this political notion in Peruvian history, and compares it to previous rights. At the beginning of the examined period, during Fujimorism, it is an authoritarian right. Subsequently, it becomes a right that ensures the continuity of the model while it transitions to democracy. However, it is an unfinished transition as the neoliberal continuity promotes a limited democracy, represented by politicians but run by technocrats, and policed by large business owners. Corruption scandals in recent years have revealed the exhaustion of this arrangement, and in the absence of an alternative two factions of neoliberalism compete for finding a way out, the remains and heirs to Fujimorism, and the one born in democracy. Neither has yet proven able t...

La relación entre sociología y política durante el periodo comprendiendo entre los años sesenta y fines del siglo XX es el punto central del análisis del autor realiza en este articulo y para lo cual desarrolla algunas hipótesis explicativas, Una relación que es vista no solo en el aspecto académico sino también e su característica de acción practica. Sin reclamar ninguna imparcialidad llega a concluir que la sociología, a pesar de las tormentas, en la actualidad esta esforzándose por desarrollar enfoques interpretativos para el análisis de los fenómenos políticos y contribuir a la explicación de nuestra realidad cambiante

This papel' examines the COIl(;q)fS ofState. reform of the Suue and the processes ofpolitical democratization in Latiu Americe and Pe/'1I (J{ (he beginnins; of'the :} / si cent IIIT, 11 explores public opinion about the Peru+ian SWl(!, (he contradictions between State and market econotuy aud finallv propases threc processes: nationalizauon. dcmocratization (//1(1dcsprivtuizucion [FrITePeruvian Statc is to achievc htgi/il//üc\' as tlu: politicul authoritv ofthe citizens

The current article explains the relatinonship between the lack of State support, faculty mediocrity, democratic reason and technochratic reason in the Peruvian university in the last century. It presents the sequence of logic and conflict between the different discourses in the process of reform of higher education starting with the university movement in Córdoba, Argentina in 1918 to the present times. The article highlights the formation of democratic reason in the different moments of crisis and change in the university and states that this kind of reason is the possibility of giving a future to the production of knowledge in Peru.

Este artículo trata del contrapunto entre la universidad y el poder en el Perú en los últimos cien años. Este asunto: la disputa de poder, en el mejor y el peor sentido de la palabra, es lo que va a determinar el decurso de esta relación. La universidad, en especial la universidad pública, tratando de ser un factor de democratización del país y el poder estatal, con actitudes cambiantes: la represión, el abandono, la privatización; buscando domesticar los impulsos rebeldes y cuestionadores de los universitarios. El portal de mira es la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, desde su tradición, importancia y liderazgo, pero también desde su decadencia. Se trata, por lo demás, de un contrapunto irresuelto, que continúa una de las muchas interrogantes sobre el futuro de la democratización del Perú.

No description

No description

No description

This article places the origin and development of the Peruvian Right as a neoliberal right over the period 1990-2020. The study delves into the roots of this political notion in Peruvian history, and compares it to previous rights. At the beginning of the examined period, during Fujimorism, it is an authoritarian right. Subsequently, it becomes a right that ensures the continuity of the model while it transitions to democracy. However, it is an unfinished transition as the neoliberal continuity promotes a limited democracy, represented by politicians but run by technocrats, and policed by large business owners. Corruption scandals in recent years have revealed the exhaustion of this arrangement, and in the absence of an alternative two factions of neoliberalism compete for finding a way out, the remains and heirs to Fujimorism, and the one born in democracy. Neither has yet proven able t...

4 fotografías : byn