The article studies the evolution of constitutionalism in Peru from a historical perspective, linking the period from the pre-independence stage to the installation of the first Court of Justice. The historical tract dates from the first period, called constitutional prehistory of 1810, with the beginning of the Cortes of Cadiz, followed by the constitutional history up to April 30, 1824. The approach, being transversal, requires the study of the liberalism of the early nineteenth century, constitutionalism, the theory of division of powers, and the jurisdictional function, whose evolution allowed the installation of the first Court of Justice. This had as its constitutional basis article 101 of the Constitution of 1823, a text that some historians consider that it did not have any influence, which this study contradicts.

The article studies the evolution of constitutionalism in Peru from a historical perspective, linking the period from the pre-independence stage to the installation of the first Court of Justice. The historical tract dates from the first period, called constitutional prehistory of 1810, with the beginning of the Cortes of Cadiz, followed by the constitutional history up to April 30, 1824. The approach, being transversal, requires the study of the liberalism of the early nineteenth century, constitutionalism, the theory of division of powers, and the jurisdictional function, whose evolution allowed the installation of the first Court of Justice. This had as its constitutional basis article 101 of the Constitution of 1823, a text that some historians consider that it did not have any influence, which this study contradicts.

En la investigación se plantea que el Juez crea derecho, porque ya no es un mero intérprete de la ley; sino porque, usa la información de los hechos que aportan las partes para ajustar el mandato genérico contenido en la norma y encontrarle su uso específico, para una decisión objetiva y materialmente justa al caso concreto. El procedimiento seguido para sustentar este planteamiento consistió en la identificación y descripción de ciertos argumentos teóricos, esto es, de los elementos direccionales de la creación judicial del derecho; y, el posterior análisis de dichos argumentos teóricos seleccionados, que sustentaron la hipótesis , para lo cual fue necesario la respectiva búsqueda y recopilación de todo el material bibliográfico, constituido por la doctrina tanto nacional y extranjera; así como por la legislación nacional; esto es captar la literatura existente respec...