The cave of Huagapo located in the district of Palcamayo province of Tarma in the Junín region – Peru, at 3572 m.s.n.m. currently said natural training was traveled up to 2800 meters, currently for tourist use from the entrance of the grotto are 212m.(dry route). The research was based on the analysis of tourist load capacity (CCT), with the methodology of Cifuentes 2003, Finding first the physical load capacity (CCF), then analyzed correction factors (Fc) o find the actual load capacity (CCR), it was subsequently analyzed as manageable capacity (CM) and this was multiplied with the CCR. Thus achieving the effective load capacity (CCE) or what is called the tourist load capacity (CCT). The results of which were: CCF 2 692 visits per day; Fc. 0.324002; CCE 872 visitors per day and finally CCE 483 visitors per day. This can be said to be the first phase or task to develop sustainable to...

The cave of Huagapo located in the district of Palcamayo province of Tarma in the Junín region – Peru, at 3572 m.s.n.m. currently said natural training was traveled up to 2800 meters, currently for tourist use from the entrance of the grotto are 212m.(dry route). The research was based on the analysis of tourist load capacity (CCT), with the methodology of Cifuentes 2003, Finding first the physical load capacity (CCF), then analyzed correction factors (Fc) o find the actual load capacity (CCR), it was subsequently analyzed as manageable capacity (CM) and this was multiplied with the CCR. Thus achieving the effective load capacity (CCE) or what is called the tourist load capacity (CCT). The results of which were: CCF 2 692 visits per day; Fc. 0.324002; CCE 872 visitors per day and finally CCE 483 visitors per day. This can be said to be the first phase or task to develop sustainable to...

The Huagapo grotto located in Palcamayo, Tarma, Junín region - Peru, at 3572 m.a.s.l. It was traveled up to 2800 meters deep, for tourist use it is traveled 212 meters (dry route). The work is based on the tourist carrying capacity calculated with the Cifuentes methodology and improved with the CATUM multicriteria tourist reception calculation, finding the physical carrying capacity CCF, the correction factors Fc, real carrying capacity CCR, management capacity CM and effective carrying capacity CCE or called tourist carrying capacity CCT, CATUM methodology for weighting correction factors with multicriteria analysis and the 3S methodology at three levels. The results were: CCF= 2692 visits; Fc= 0.324002; CCR=1323, CCE-Cifuentes= 483 visitors, CATUM=732 visitors per day, with a difference of 249 visitors between both methodologies. It is concluded that the CATUM methodology serves to pe...