El presente estudio “Los criterios sustancialista y procesalista en la prisión preventiva y los principios constitucionales, en la Corte Superior de Justicia de Cañete, de enero 2016 a julio 2017”, cuyo objetivo fue analizar de qué manera los criterios sustancialista y procesalista aplicados en la prisión preventiva, impactan en la vulneración de los principios constitucionales, en las resoluciones emitidas por la Corte Superior de Justicia de Cañete, de enero 2016 a julio 2017. Desde esta perspectiva, se establecieron variables relacionadas a los Criterios Sustancialistas y Procesalistas y los Principios Constitucionales. Material y Métodos: En una población de diez Magistrado se utilizó una muestra censal y una muestra no probabilística de las Resoluciones emitidas por la Corte Superior de Justicia de Cañete entre enero 2016 a Julio 2017, diseñándose un instrumento par...

The study, conducted between January and March 2024 in Lima, aimed to describe the implications of the prohibition of marriage in minors in Peru regarding parental responsibility. Twelve magistrates were surveyed using Google Forms to explore their opinions. Data were analyzed using SPSS v25, employing frequency analysis to determine percentages. 58.33% of respondents consider parental consent essential for minor marriage, while 33.3% do not. Judges have key roles: safeguarding the child's best interest (41.667%), assessing their psychological and physical state (33.33%), and preventing forced marriage (25%). The incapacity of parents or grandparents is relevant in 58.33% of decisions. Moreover, 41.60% consider a minor's pregnancy when deciding on a judicial dispensation. 50% are unaware of the legal meaning of emancipation, and 83.30% believe society is not prepared for adolescents to a...

The objective of the study was to describe the frequency of preventive detention criteria and their interpretation concerning potential environmental justice from substantialist, proceduralist, and mixed criteria perspectives. The study, with a quantitative approach, analyzed 120 preventive detention cases in the Superior Court of Justice of Cañete (2016-2017), Lima, Peru using a structured questionnaire and SPSS v25 for data analysis. The results indicated that 58.3% of cases applied substantialist criteria, prioritizing the severity of the crime, while 25% applied proceduralist criteria, and 16.7% used mixed criteria. Although substantialist criteria ensure environmental protection, they could compromise rights such as the presumption of innocence. In the discussion, it is highlighted that the predominance of these criteria could affect the fairness of the judicial system, suggesting ...