This paper considers litterature as literacy. Modero culture supports litteraturebecause it contributes to its own legitimation. The reactions to thisphenomenon are different. They depend on the identity of each subject: theone who belongs to the hegemonic culture and ihe other, who sufres thedomination. Both perspectives are the beginning of an analisys that reviewsthe process of peruvian narrative, discovers the writting crisis andits rationality, but, at the same time, reveals the rasing of an utopic writtingof cultural resistance to the impositions of postmodemity.

El presente artículo realiza una revisión somera de los integrantes del círculo bajtiniano y una lectura crítica de sus proyectos y aportes intelectuales surgidos en un contexto intelectual de crisis del positivismo y del historicismo. Según el autor, se trata de una poética social que busca a su vez diferenciarse de los formalistas rusos y de la crítica literaria marxista ortodoxa, que coloca a sus integrantes en un cierto ámbito de marginalidad en la medida que apela a pensadores como Kant, Buber o Cassirer, considerados como idealistas y reaccionarios por el entorno oficial de la Rusia estalinista de aquel entonces, y en la medida que constituye un patético alegato contra el discurso monológico autoritario dominante.

No description

This paper explores literature and art’s role in human evolution, highlighting their permanence and impact through time. From the origins of language to its current digital transformation, human capacity remains a bulwark against the homogenising tendencies driven by artificial intelligence. It is therefore important to warn against the risk of reducing language to a mere vehicle of information, which could threaten freedom and creation, essential for a critical conscience. The tension between technological progress and the preservation of humanist values is addressed through an analysis that evokes thinkers such as Éric Sadin and Karl Marx. In this way, it is a call to resist the imposition of authoritarian control, which simultaneously advocates the vindication of creative plurality, chance, and affectivity, as motors of new forms of existence.

No description