This research seeks to establish the implications of the Brasilia Rules in Mexico, based on the study of the criteria contemplated in these rules, the conceptual delimitation of the right of access to justice, and the establishment of its implications in the area of family justice. In this sense, a rigorous study was carried out on the importance and validity of the application of the Brasilia Rules in judicial proceedings in family matters in Mexico, with the intention of making effective the right of access to justice in favor of the members of the families that are in a situation of vulnerability at the moment of facing the justice systems.

The educational and labor panorama of the Law Career in Mexico is a challenge; 3440 institutions offer it, 13 % of which are accredited, raising doubts about its quality. The traditional teaching of Criminal Law perpetuated dogmatism, without criticism in the students. In contrast, Tecnológico de Monterrey innovated with learning through ethical and citizen competencies and clinical teaching, which theorizes in reality. The «Voice of the Victims» program integrated professionalism with access to justice for groups in vulnerable situations. Through the Criminal Law and crimes block, especially in the «Tec21»educational model, the study of feminicide corroborates the hypothesis that framing the behavior within the typical description is not enough for its comprehensive vision. Likewise, it limits the purposeful exercise of its reduction.

The traditional study of real rights has been shaped by a unidirectional conception derived from dominium, focused on the subject-holder and object relationship. This approach, rooted in 19th-century categories, has hindered the analysis of complex contemporary legal realities. To address this shortcoming, an organic-global methodological approach is proposed—one that analyzes real rights based on the complex legal relationship, integrating its structural elements (subjective, objective, and causal). This proposal arises from the critical analysis of law school curricula from leading faculties in Spain and Mexico, where the persistence of static theoretical models was identified. Its goal is to reform legal education through a critical and organic mindset that goes beyond merely describing entitlements and instead examines interactions between ownership, propter rem duties, and erga om...

The traditional study of real rights has been shaped by a unidirectional conception derived from dominium, focused on the subject-holder and object relationship. This approach, rooted in 19th-century categories, has hindered the analysis of complex contemporary legal realities. To address this shortcoming, an organic-global methodological approach is proposed—one that analyzes real rights based on the complex legal relationship, integrating its structural elements (subjective, objective, and causal). This proposal arises from the critical analysis of law school curricula from leading faculties in Spain and Mexico, where the persistence of static theoretical models was identified. Its goal is to reform legal education through a critical and organic mindset that goes beyond merely describing entitlements and instead examines interactions between ownership, propter rem duties, and erga om...