The economic value creation is something that affects all companies, that is why, it is crucial to establish , for which purpose, there are a variety of procedures. Among which, especially the method of economic value added (EVA), which can compare the yield of investment to its financial cost. This methodology is very useful, but its definition does not distinguish EVA from the business effects with EVA generated results, so in this article we propose a new way to determine the EVA that allows differentiation and the EVA distinction created by many results achievable by the company. Finally, an explanatory case it is presented to demonstrate if the new proposal it is applicable or not.

The pension system in Chile is operated by private entities, called AFP, to which every worker must contribute 10% of their income on mandatory individual savings plans for retirement plus a variable fee to the direct benefit of the AFP. On the other hand, the employer quotes a percentage of worker's compensation insurance to fund disability and survivors through the AFP itself. The affiliate can freely choose the fund that will integrate its individual contribution, as the level of risk to take and the expected return to be obtained, among the five available funds. It is expected that the AFP achieves the highest possible return to their members with the commission charged by your management, but according to the results obtained, there is no evidence found to say conclusively that the commissions influence the behavior of the income of the various funds.

The pension system in Chile is operated by private entities, called AFP, to which every worker must contribute 10% of their income on mandatory individual savings plans for retirement plus a variable fee to the direct benefit of the AFP. On the other hand, the employer quotes a percentage of worker’s compensation insurance to fund disability and survivors through the AFP itself. The affiliate can freely choose the fund that will integrate its individual contribution, as the level of risk to take and the expected return to be obtained, among the five available funds. It is expected that the AFP achieves the highest possible return to their members with the commission charged by your management, but according to the results obtained, there is no evidence found to say conclusively that the commissions influence the behavior of the income of the various funds. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.101...