El presente trabajo de investigación, es puesto a consideración del jurado, que de acuerdo a las normas legales vigentes es necesario para optar el Título de Magíster, la Tesis se titula: “Alcances normativos de la teoría de la imputación objetiva para delimitar los delitos de lavado de activos”, destinada a aportar una solución a la problemática que ha provocado el afán expansivo de la legislación actual y jurisprudencial, en materia de lavado de activos, proponiendo que algunos criterios de la teoría de la imputación objetiva, aplicados por los operadores del derecho, ayudaran a delimitar correctamente la tipicidad del delito de lavado de activos. Los planteamientos hechos, en esta tesis, las soluciones planteadas al problema descrito, las conclusiones y recomendaciones producidas, ojala sean de utilidad, y marquen, el inicio de seguir complementando y ampliando esta in...

 The objective of this paper is to analyze self-laundering in Peru, regulated in the last part of article 10 of Legislative Decree 1106, which literally says: "It can be considered the perpetrator of the crime and therefore subject to investigation and prosecution for asset laundering, anyone who executed or participated in the criminal activities that generated money, goods, effects or profits”. The problem posed is the following: Is it possible to penalize self-laudering behaviors in Peru, without infringing the principle of "Ne bis in Ídem", from the entry into force of article 2 of Legislative Decree 1106, modified by Legislative Decree 1249, that has eliminated the purposes of the asset laundering process? This paper ends proposing a solution for that question.

The present work aims to analyze the article 419 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in accordance with article 425 (3) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which allows the conviction of the acquitted by the Superior Criminal Court, a rule that remains in force despite the fact that, the majority of the jurisprudence issued by the Supreme Court of the Republic and the Constitutional Court itself have declared that convincing the acquitted violates the right to a plurality of instances, a fundamental right contained in article 139 (6) of the Constitution of Peru. And even the Constitutional Court in its ruling in case No. 04374-2015-PHC/TC, dated July 21, 2020, urged the Congress of the Republic to establish an amendment to article 425 (3) (b) of the current Code of Criminal Procedure to enable the review, through an ordinary appeal, of the conviction of the person acquitted in...

 The objective of this paper is to analyze self-laundering in Peru, regulated in the last part of article 10 of Legislative Decree 1106, which literally says: "It can be considered the perpetrator of the crime and therefore subject to investigation and prosecution for asset laundering, anyone who executed or participated in the criminal activities that generated money, goods, effects or profits”. The problem posed is the following: Is it possible to penalize self-laudering behaviors in Peru, without infringing the principle of "Ne bis in Ídem", from the entry into force of article 2 of Legislative Decree 1106, modified by Legislative Decree 1249, that has eliminated the purposes of the asset laundering process? This paper ends proposing a solution for that question.

The present work aims to analyze the article 419 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in accordance with article 425 (3) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which allows the conviction of the acquitted by the Superior Criminal Court, a rule that remains in force despite the fact that, the majority of the jurisprudence issued by the Supreme Court of the Republic and the Constitutional Court itself have declared that convincing the acquitted violates the right to a plurality of instances, a fundamental right contained in article 139 (6) of the Constitution of Peru. And even the Constitutional Court in its ruling in case No. 04374-2015-PHC/TC, dated July 21, 2020, urged the Congress of the Republic to establish an amendment to article 425 (3) (b) of the current Code of Criminal Procedure to enable the review, through an ordinary appeal, of the conviction of the person acquitted in...