In September 2019, Peruvian President Martín Vizcarra dissolved the Congress of the Republic and called for extraordinary legislative elections. During the ensuing parliamentary interregnum, which is the time between the dissolution of the Congress and the installation of the new one, the Executive branch assumed legislative functions through urgency decrees, arguing that the Constitution allowed for extraordinary legislative measures. However, some scholars argued that these decrees extended beyond economic and financial matters, representing an overreach of power. The research poses two hypotheses: that the urgency decrees exceeded the constitutional matters and that they lacked sufficient political control to prevent power concentration. To address two hypotheses, a qualitative analysis is conducted on the urgency decrees issued during the parliamentary interregnum, examining their c...