The discrimination or vexation of rights suffered by a given person cannot and should never be corrected by causing other discrimination or vexation equal to or worse than that which is intended to be tackled, and even less so against the other who is supposed to remain, at present, the same historical discriminator and vexatious person who is accused. This article will analyse why accepting a kind of exchange of one form of discrimination for another is a contradiction and a recklessness that, in the world of rights, is irrefutably unacceptable.

In this work I seek to awake a reflection on the legal situation that is causing discrimination against men because of sex and that, in turn, benefits women granting them procedural and normative privileges, for the same reason. I do not deny the historical discrimination women have suffered over the time and in this article I give clear evidence of this and affirm that this discriminatory idea still remains alive in some heads, even in notorious persons of our society. However, in this article I reject that this situation can justify from the Law legal rules that harass the dignity of man for the simple fact of being. The State, wanting to give immediate and efficient answers, especially through the popular pressure of some interested people, has ended up establishing abusive and disproportionate norms against men. Being able to, unfairly mistreat a man in his dignity, because the law f...

Human dignity means understanding human beings as beings that, due to its specific characteristics that are specific to the human condition, has a special value that requires recognition and respect from society. Human being would be placed in the center of the world, occupying a preeminent place with respect to the other beings. Thus, speaking of a human dignity of all human beings, equal for all as human beings, supposes placing ourselves in a universal and unified vision as to what it is. Here then, the problem begins. It is easy to find references to human dignity in many regulations, especially in human rights, both in national and international norms. In these regulations we will find, easily, the use of the term dignity repeated several times to sustain a certain right or legal argument, but not to define what is precisely and properly human dignity. Then, everything goes well as ...