Peru has been the object of 28 judgments of conviction by the Inter-American Courtof Human Rights, what makes it the member country with the largest number of thesesentences. To date, it has complied with complete reparations in only two cases. Theauthor analyses the type of reparations ordered in the sentences, and the causes of thehigh level of non-compliance. Finally, she makes offers of modification to the specificregulation on the matter, unification of the jurisprudence on the part of the PenalRooms of the Supreme Court, between others, to solve partly detected problematic,although the Peruvian State has the obligation to comply with the Court judgmentson having had accepted his contentious jurisdiction.

The present article analyzes and interprets the Litigation of Competition relapse in the N° 18-2004 File, explaining its ends withnormative character, referred to the reaches of the military jurisdiction and the notion of function of the members of the Armed Forces and the National Police of Peru

The present article analyzes and interprets the Litigation of Competition relapse in the N° 18-2004 File, explaining its ends withnormative character, referred to the reaches of the military jurisdiction and the notion of function of the members of the Armed Forces and the National Police of Peru