No presenta resumen

En el presente artículo, se puede observar el trabajo de un litigante que busca reflexionar sobre su practica diaria. El autor busca poner al descubierto una costumbre generalizada como la de agregar el criterio de antijuridicidad en el juicio de resarcibilidad, mediante un análisis comparativo de los sistemas civiles que inspiraron la normativa peruana, el autor demuestra la no esencialidad de la antijuridicidad, que busca generar una ampliación del campo de acciónde la responsabilidad civil.

No presenta resumen

En el presente artículo, se puede observar el trabajo de un litigante que busca reflexionar sobre su practica diaria. El autor busca poner al descubierto una costumbre generalizada como la de agregar el criterio de antijuridicidad en el juicio de resarcibilidad, mediante un análisis comparativo de los sistemas civiles que inspiraron la normativa peruana, el autor demuestra la no esencialidad de la antijuridicidad, que busca generar una ampliación del campo de acciónde la responsabilidad civil.

This article addresses the issue referred to harmful lawful acts which also generate liability, thus ruling out the unlawfulness as an essential element for the generation of liability. In this regard, the author makes a conceptual analysis of the unlawfulness or illegality, and he examines three cases of liability, such as environmental damage, the interim resolution and withdraw the work of trade; demonstrating, effectively, the dispensable nature of the unlawfulness and the existence of scenarios of liability arising from harmful lawful acts.

No description

No description

No description

In August 2014, the Peruvian Supreme Courten acted  the  Fifth  Civil  Cassation Plenary, which establishes that any challenging madeto an associative agreement must be realized through the procedure referred to in the article92 of the Peruvian Civil Code. The comments and criticisms to this decision have not beenfew, considering the complexity of the theme discussed in the aforementioned decision.In this context, with the present article the author realizes a thorough critique of such Cassation Plenary. Based on the analysis of civil and procedural legal concepts, he reaches a conclusion: That the plenary decision, besides of having multiple legal errors, won't accomplish its purpose.

One of the main objectives of any legal system is legal certainty, which is understood as the provision of decisions in the work of the courts. To this end, in order to standardize the diversity of decisions of courts for the same conflict, there are meetings of supreme judges who seek to give a unique sense of resolution to the same conflict. Those meetings are called Cassation Plenaries.In this article, the author comments and develops the decision taken at the IX Civil Cassation Plenary. At that meeting a broad criterion of manifested nullity has been chosen, whenever the causal is “easy to warn”. However, throughout the text the author highlights the methodological vices of the Supreme Court to reach this conclusion and, using a legal comparison, proposes a different criterion of manifest nullity, demonstrating that for our legal system this should not be restricted t...

En el presente artículo el autor realiza un reexamen del “ejercicio regular de un derecho” de cara a su consideración como presunta causal absoluta de exclusión de responsabilidad civil. Al respecto, el autor da una mirada más allá de lo evidente y nos presenta una postura interesante al sostener que es posible que el ejercicio regular de un derecho active la tutela resarcitoria. Así, se propone que el análisis de la responsabilidad civil se efectúe tomando en cuenta dos supuestos: el abuso del derecho y la colisión de derechos. Finalmente, dando énfasis al escenario de colisión de derechos, el autor insta a la realización de una ponderación de intereses o, como él lo denomina, un “juicio de resarcibilidad” de los intereses tanto de la víctima como del autor del daño. This article analyzes the regular exercise of a right in relation to its consideration as a cause...

No description

In August 2014, the Peruvian Supreme Courten acted  the  Fifth  Civil  Cassation Plenary, which establishes that any challenging madeto an associative agreement must be realized through the procedure referred to in the article92 of the Peruvian Civil Code. The comments and criticisms to this decision have not beenfew, considering the complexity of the theme discussed in the aforementioned decision.In this context, with the present article the author realizes a thorough critique of such Cassation Plenary. Based on the analysis of civil and procedural legal concepts, he reaches a conclusion: That the plenary decision, besides of having multiple legal errors, won't accomplish its purpose.

This article addresses the issue referred to harmful lawful acts which also generate liability, thus ruling out the unlawfulness as an essential element for the generation of liability. In this regard, the author makes a conceptual analysis of the unlawfulness or illegality, and he examines three cases of liability, such as environmental damage, the interim resolution and withdraw the work of trade; demonstrating, effectively, the dispensable nature of the unlawfulness and the existence of scenarios of liability arising from harmful lawful acts.

No presenta resumen

One of the main objectives of any legal system is legal certainty, which is understood as the provision of decisions in the work of the courts. To this end, in order to standardize the diversity of decisions of courts for the same conflict, there are meetings of supreme judges who seek to give a unique sense of resolution to the same conflict. Those meetings are called Cassation Plenaries.In this article, the author comments and develops the decision taken at the IX Civil Cassation Plenary. At that meeting a broad criterion of manifested nullity has been chosen, whenever the causal is “easy to warn”. However, throughout the text the author highlights the methodological vices of the Supreme Court to reach this conclusion and, using a legal comparison, proposes a different criterion of manifest nullity, demonstrating that for our legal system this should not be restricted t...

En el presente artículo el autor realiza un reexamen del “ejercicio regular de un derecho” de cara a su consideración como presunta causal absoluta de exclusión de responsabilidad civil. Al respecto, el autor da una mirada más allá de lo evidente y nos presenta una postura interesante al sostener que es posible que el ejercicio regular de un derecho active la tutela resarcitoria. Así, se propone que el análisis de la responsabilidad civil se efectúe tomando en cuenta dos supuestos: el abuso del derecho y la colisión de derechos. Finalmente, dando énfasis al escenario de colisión de derechos, el autor insta a la realización de una ponderación de intereses o, como él lo denomina, un “juicio de resarcibilidad” de los intereses tanto de la víctima como del autor del daño. This article analyzes the regular exercise of a right in relation to its consideration as a cause...

No presenta resumen

En el presente artículo, se puede observar el trabajo de un litigante que busca reflexionar sobre su practica diaria. El autor busca poner al descubierto una costumbre generalizada como la de agregar el criterio de antijuridicidad en el juicio de resarcibilidad, mediante un análisis comparativo de los sistemas civiles que inspiraron la normativa peruana, el autor demuestra la no esencialidad de la antijuridicidad, que busca generar una ampliación del campo de acciónde la responsabilidad civil.

No description