The purpose of this article is to analyze the application of the exception of inadmissibility of the action in the intermediate stage and its collision with the assumption of dismissal regulated in paragraph b of numeral 2 of article 344 of the Procedural Code. The study will have as a starting point the old criminal procedural regime applied in the Republic of Peru, to then consider comparative regulations of other countries, some of them with an accusatory-guarantist influence regarding the application of the punitive penal process, such as the Chilean Procedural Code of 2002, the Colombian Code of Criminal Procedure of 2004, the Argentinean Code of Criminal Procedure of 2014, the 1998 Code of Criminal Procedure of Paraguay, the 2000 Code of Criminal Procedure of Ecuador, the 2001 Organic Code of Criminal Procedure of Venezuela, the 1999 Code of Criminal Procedure of Bolivia, the 1998 ...

The purpose of this article is to analyze the application of the exception of inadmissibility of the action in the intermediate stage and its collision with the assumption of dismissal regulated in paragraph b of numeral 2 of article 344 of the Procedural Code. The study will have as a starting point the old criminal procedural regime applied in the Republic of Peru, to then consider comparative regulations of other countries, some of them with an accusatory-guarantist influence regarding the application of the punitive penal process, such as the Chilean Procedural Code of 2002, the Colombian Code of Criminal Procedure of 2004, the Argentinean Code of Criminal Procedure of 2014, the 1998 Code of Criminal Procedure of Paraguay, the 2000 Code of Criminal Procedure of Ecuador, the 2001 Organic Code of Criminal Procedure of Venezuela, the 1999 Code of Criminal Procedure of Bolivia, the 1998 ...

Esta investigación tuvo como de partida el problema generado por la aplicación del artículo 57° del Código Penal, que impide imponer un periodo de prueba menor a un año, lo que genera una incongruencia en los casos en los que se ha accedido a la conclusión anticipada negociada y la pena privativa de la libertad suspendida es menor a un año. En ese sentido, la pregunta formulada ha sido ¿Cuáles son los fundamentos jurídicos para sustentar la imposición de un periodo de prueba menor al establecido en el artículo 57° del Código Penal, en los casos en que por conclusión anticipada negociada del proceso, se haya acordado la imposición de una pena privativa de la libertad menor a un año?. La hipótesis que se ha demostrado es: Los fundamentos jurídicos pro homine y proporcionalidad sustentan la imposición de un periodo de prueba menor al establecido en el artículo 57° del...