En el mundo jurídico peruano es común pensar que el Derecho Civil cambia más lento que el Derecho Penal o que el Derecho Comercial, y que, después de la Constitución peruana, el Código Civil es el más importante cuerpo legislativo de nuestro Estado-nación. Hoy, a treinta años de su vigencia como marco normativo civil, podemos tener por cierta tal aseveración. Sin embargo, en algunas materias como el domicilio, el cambio se ha presentado con más rapidez. No obstante las luces que trajo consigo durante algún tiempo el entonces novísimo Código Civil sobre dicha materia, pronto se alzarían sobre estas algunas sombras por contrastar con los conceptos de domicilio introducidos por una nueva Constitución que entraba en vigencia con gran vigor. Así treinta años después de la dación del Código Civil, entre luces y sombras, continuamos reflexionando todavía sobre esta importa...

In the Peruvian legal world is commonly thought that the Civil Law changes slower than the criminal law or commercial law, and that after the Peruvian Constitution, the Civil Code is the highest legislative body of our nation state. Today, thirty years of his term as a civil regulatory framework, we can be certain of that assertion. However, in some areas such as home, the change has been made faster. However lights for some time brought the then brand-new Civil Code on this matter, it soon would rise on some shadows contrast with the concepts of domicile introduced by a new constitution which came into force with great vigor. Thus, thirty years after the enactment of the Civil Code, between light and shadow, yet we continue to reflect on this important legal concept born of ancient Rome.

Currently, the evolution and recognition of the protection of fundamental rights has increased to a universality of social understanding, thus, the responsibility to protect (RoP) a relatively new category of international law (2005) has had a great development due to Of the different questions to its "content", whether it is formally recognized by the United Nations (UN) or the "content" developed by the doctrine as a complement to the recognized, these questions are mainly based on the change inthe understanding of sovereignty and the principle of non-intervention, the conflict of preference between order and justice in the ROP and the controversy of whether the UN Security Council makes effective the necessary intervention of the use of force through some cases seen so far.