The New Procedural Labor Act has promoted the principles of orality and procedural economy, but a problem arises when monetary claims are promoted without expressing the amount of these. Such scenery creates a situation of ambiguity that allows the defendant to formulate an «exception», and thereby delay the process due to the negligence of the plaintiff. In this work, it is proposed that the plaintiff will be obliged to quantify the amount required at the relevant hearing, in order to allow the defendant to know this amount in a timely manner and not harm his right of defense.

The implementation of the Bureau of Electronic Parts of the Judiciary means a transformation in the practices of Peruvian litigants, since they have access to a technological tool that allows them to file pleadings and claims of all kinds before the courts of justice, using Internet connections continuously 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. This change has an impact on the criteria of accessibility to the courts used in labor proceedings to compute expiration periods and makes a change in the rule necessary, since the new technology allows permanent and uninterrupted access to the courts and renders anachronistic the criterion that counted expiration periods according to the possibility of the plaintiff to go in person to a physical court.