En el presente artículo, el autor propone una interpretación del artículo 159 del Código Tributario conforme al contenido del derecho constitucional a la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva, haciendo énfasis en uno de los derechos que lo conforman: el derecho a la tutela cautelar. Asimismo, establece una definición de medida cautelar y explica sus características, su fundamento constitucional y los presupuestos que se deben cumplir para que sea concedida y ejecutada.

The object of the principle of material truth is to assure the certainty of facts in order to be able to issue a ruling as close to reality as possible. The principle has an intimate relationship with the limitation periods which, as regulated in our Tax Code, are only established as minimum terms in which the tax debt or has to comply with the administration’s requirements, without specifying any maximum. The author explains how it is that the terms regarding the presentation of documents have to be fixed considering the civilian’s interestand not against it. He affirms that, as long as the collection procedure of a certain period has not concluded, the debtor has the faculty to offer information and arguments to the administration in order to sustain his statement, allowing him to discuss the objections formulated against him.

The object of the principle of material truth is to assure the certainty of facts in order to be able to issue a ruling as close to reality as possible. The principle has an intimate relationship with the limitation periods which, as regulated in our Tax Code, are only established as minimum terms in which the tax debt or has to comply with the administration’s requirements, without specifying any maximum. The author explains how it is that the terms regarding the presentation of documents have to be fixed considering the civilian’s interestand not against it. He affirms that, as long as the collection procedure of a certain period has not concluded, the debtor has the faculty to offer information and arguments to the administration in order to sustain his statement, allowing him to discuss the objections formulated against him.

No presenta resumen

En el presente artículo, el autor propone una interpretación del artículo 159 del Código Tributario conforme al contenido del derecho constitucional a la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva, haciendo énfasis en uno de los derechos que lo conforman: el derecho a la tutela cautelar. Asimismo, establece una definición de medida cautelar y explica sus características, su fundamento constitucional y los presupuestos que se deben cumplir para que sea concedida y ejecutada.

En el presente artículo, el autor propone una interpretación del artículo 159 del Código Tributario conforme al contenido del derecho constitucional a la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva, haciendo énfasis en uno de los derechos que lo conforman: el derecho a la tutela cautelar. Asimismo, establece una definición de medida cautelar y explica sus características, su fundamento constitucional y los presupuestos que se deben cumplir para que sea concedida y ejecutada.

The object of the principle of material truth is to assure the certainty of facts in order to be able to issue a ruling as close to reality as possible. The principle has an intimate relationship with the limitation periods which, as regulated in our Tax Code, are only established as minimum terms in which the tax debt or has to comply with the administration’s requirements, without specifying any maximum. The author explains how it is that the terms regarding the presentation of documents have to be fixed considering the civilian’s interestand not against it. He affirms that, as long as the collection procedure of a certain period has not concluded, the debtor has the faculty to offer information and arguments to the administration in order to sustain his statement, allowing him to discuss the objections formulated against him.

Mediante la Primera Disposición Complementaria Transitoria del Decreto Legislativo No. 1421 (PDCT), publicado en septiembre de 2018, se reguló legislativamente el inicio del plazo de prescripción de la acción para exigir el cobro de las deudas tributarias, sobre deudas tributarias cuyo plazo de prescripción en mención ocurrió hasta el 1 de enero de 2012. La entrada en vigencia de la PDCT generó -en su momento y hasta la fecha- discusión en diversos foros acerca de si se infringió o no diversas disposiciones, constitucionales y legales, asociadas -principalmente- a la aplicación correcta de la ley en el tiempo y a la seguridad jurídica. Esta controversia, en el plano judicial, se resolvió con la sentencia No. 556/2020, emitida por el Tribunal Constitucional, en la que se analizó la declaración de inconstitucionalidad de la PDCT. En el presente trabajo, sobre la base previa ...

El presente documento pretende abordar, en un primer momento, el tratamiento legislativo que ha tenido en el tiempo el artículo 157 del Código Tributario, en relación con la posibilidad que la Administración Tributaria pueda impugnar en la vía del proceso contencioso administrativo las resoluciones que emite el Tribunal Fiscal. Sobre esa base, en un segundo momento se analizará los alcances normativos de esta materia a partir del texto vigente del artículo 157 del Código Tributario.

This document intends to address, at first, the legislative treatment that article 157 of the Tax Code has had over time, in relation to the possibility that the Tax Administration may challenge the resolutions issued by the Tax Court through the contentious-administrative process. On this basis, in a second stage, the normative scope of this matter will be analyzed based on the current text of article 157 of the Tax Code.

Mediante la Primera Disposición Complementaria Transitoria del Decreto Legislativo No. 1421 (PDCT), publicado en septiembre de 2018, se reguló legislativamente el inicio del plazo de prescripción de la acción para exigir el cobro de las deudas tributarias, sobre deudas tributarias cuyo plazo de prescripción en mención ocurrió hasta el 1 de enero de 2012. La entrada en vigencia de la PDCT generó -en su momento y hasta la fecha- discusión en diversos foros acerca de si se infringió o no diversas disposiciones, constitucionales y legales, asociadas -principalmente- a la aplicación correcta de la ley en el tiempo y a la seguridad jurídica. Esta controversia, en el plano judicial, se resolvió con la sentencia No. 556/2020, emitida por el Tribunal Constitucional, en la que se analizó la declaración de inconstitucionalidad de la PDCT. En el presente trabajo, sobre la base previa ...

This paper aims to offer some brief reflections on the legal effect generated by the entry into force of the First Transitory Complementary Provision of the Legislative Decree 1421 for purposes of the regulatory regime related to the start of the statute of limitation for the exercise of the power of the tax authority to demand payment of the tax debt, as amended by Legislative Decree 1113.

This document intends to address, at first, the legislative treatment that article 157 of the Tax Code has had over time, in relation to the possibility that the Tax Administration may challenge the resolutions issued by the Tax Court through the contentious-administrative process. On this basis, in a second stage, the normative scope of this matter will be analyzed based on the current text of article 157 of the Tax Code.

This paper aims to offer some brief reflections on the legal effect generated by the entry into force of the First Transitory Complementary Provision of the Legislative Decree 1421 for purposes of the regulatory regime related to the start of the statute of limitation for the exercise of the power of the tax authority to demand payment of the tax debt, as amended by Legislative Decree 1113.

No presenta resumen

No presenta resumen

No presenta resumen

No presenta resumen

No description

No presenta resumen