El autor realiza un análisis del pago determinable por tercero desde los recientes estudios del derecho civil patrimonial y del análisis económico del derecho.Primero se define al precio como aquella valoración subjetiva que tienen las partes contratantes respecto de determinados bienes. De la misma manera, el precio determinable es aquel que no está explicitado en el contrato, sino que en el mismo se establecen las reglas necesarias y suficientes para que, sin la posterior intervención de las partes contratantes, se pueda determinar el precio. La determinación del precio hecha por un tercero no puede ser calificada como arbitraria, ya que ésta es producto de la libre negociación de las partes. Finalmente, se sostiene que existen dos formas de comprender la naturaleza jurídica del precio determinable: considerarlo como un contrato nulo mientras esté pendiente su determ...

No description

No contiene resumen

No description

It is precisely the lack of consensus in the civil doctrine, which mostly assimilates interests as ‘civil fruits of capital’, which drew our attention to the study of the latest contributions of economic doctrine. In this work, through the dogmatic method, limited to a brief analysis for publication reasons, we intend to identify the meeting points between economic and legal doctrine about the concepts of interest and capital. Then, we will show some of the problems presented by the distinction between compensatory and moratorium interest in the peruvian Civil Code. Finally, we will conclude that the money-rate of interest is the one that must be applied to the payment for the disposition of the money capital whose determination obeys the rules of the free market.

It is precisely the lack of consensus in the civil doctrine, which mostly assimilates interests as ‘civil fruits of capital’, which drew our attention to the study of the latest contributions of economic doctrine. In this work, through the dogmatic method, limited to a brief analysis for publication reasons, we intend to identify the meeting points between economic and legal doctrine about the concepts of interest and capital. Then, we will show some of the problems presented by the distinction between compensatory and moratorium interest in the peruvian Civil Code. Finally, we will conclude that the money-rate of interest is the one that must be applied to the payment for the disposition of the money capital whose determination obeys the rules of the free market.

It is precisely the lack of consensus in the civil doctrine, which mostly assimilates interests as ‘civil fruits of capital’, which drew our attention to the study of the latest contributions of economic doctrine. In this work, through the dogmatic method, limited to a brief analysis for publication reasons, we intend to identify the meeting points between economic and legal doctrine about the concepts of interest and capital. Then, we will show some of the problems presented by the distinction between compensatory and moratorium interest in the peruvian Civil Code. Finally, we will conclude that the money-rate of interest is the one that must be applied to the payment for the disposition of the money capital whose determination obeys the rules of the free market.