Investigation developed with the purpose of knowing which are the main factors that render ineffective the anticipated proof in the crime of sexual indemnity specifically in the declaration that the victim offers through his request by the legitimate parties. Mixed type research with a non-experimental observational design and a descriptive level. The intentional sample was made up of 67 lawyers and 2 prosecutors in which they were interviewed using the semi-structured interview guide. To the main conclusions is that there was a divergence of considerations on the part of lawyers and prosecutors. Prosecutors believe that Article 242 should be amended in order for there to be an update. The non-use of the criminal procedural rule and the fiscal and defense strategy on the theory of the case are the main influencing factors

Investigation developed with the purpose of knowing which are the main factors that render ineffective the anticipated proof in the crime of sexual indemnity specifically in the declaration that the victim offers through his request by the legitimate parties. Mixed type research with a non-experimental observational design and a descriptive level. The intentional sample was made up of 67 lawyers and 2 prosecutors in which they were interviewed using the semi-structured interview guide. To the main conclusions is that there was a divergence of considerations on the part of lawyers and prosecutors. Prosecutors believe that Article 242 should be amended in order for there to be an update. The non-use of the criminal procedural rule and the fiscal and defense strategy on the theory of the case are the main influencing factors

En el presente estudio realizado, lleva como título principal “Principales Factores de Ineficacia de Norma Procesal Penal que Faculta Solicitar como Prueba Anticipada Declaración de Víctimas del Delito Indemnidad Sexual, Tacna – 2017”. Es una tesis desarrollada con el motivo de conocer cuáles son esos principales factores que vuelven ineficaz a la prueba anticipada en el delito de indemnidad sexual específicamente en la declaración que brinda la victima mediante su solicitud por las partes legitimadas. En ese sentido se propuso tres hipótesis en la cual se tiene a la hipótesis general: “La no utilización de la norma procesal penal y la estrategia fiscal y defensa sobre la teoría del caso, son los principales factores de ineficacia de norma procesal penal que faculta solicitar como prueba anticipada declaración de víctimas del delito indemnidad sexual”; la primera hi...

Investigation developed with the purpose of knowing which are the main factors that render ineffective the anticipated proof in the crime of sexual indemnity specifically in the declaration that the victim offers through his request by the legitimate parties. Mixed type research with a non-experimental observational design and a descriptive level. The intentional sample was made up of 67 lawyers and 2 prosecutors in which they were interviewed using the semi-structured interview guide. To the main conclusions is that there was a divergence of considerations on the part of lawyers and prosecutors. Prosecutors believe that Article 242 should be amended in order for there to be an update. The non-use of the criminal procedural rule and the fiscal and defense strategy on the theory of the case are the main influencing factors