The study analyzes the effects of the control of constitutionality and conventionality in the Argentine system, in light of the international systems for the protection of human rights and the legal instruments to which the Argentine State is a signatory. These systems do not have derogatory effects on domestic norms, but the inapplicability of these to the specific case and the possibility of providing for actions or omissions; that is, orders to do or not to do with respect to a specific situation in order to safeguard the principle of constitutional and conventional supremacy, so that the subjective right enshrined in these hierarchically superior norms prevails. In this perspective, the aforementioned systems of rights are of mandatory and preferential application to any domestic legislation of lower rank. In other words, it is not only the text of the covenants, conventions and trea...