This text links the concept of responsibility described by Husserl in the Crisis and the third meaning of evidence, which corresponds to the third moment of the delimitation between what is immanent and transcendent. First, the concept of evidence is examined. Second, the concept of intentionality is looked over. Third, the concept of responsibility is sketched, as well as those of freedom, the idea of humanity, history, and the task of philosophy.

Review of Sebastian Luft. Meditaciones fenomenológicas y (neo)kantianas. Filosofía trascendental, cultura y teoría de las ciencias. Bogotá: Aula de Humanidades, 2019, 334pp.

Review of Sebastian Luft. Meditaciones fenomenológicas y (neo)kantianas. Filosofíatrascendental, cultura y teoría de las ciencias. Bogotá: Aula de Humanidades,2019, 334pp.

This paper deals with the hierarchical organization of the subject’s acts and their foundational ranking according to Husserl and Scheler, emphasizing emotional acts and their correlative objects –values. Husserl argues that cognitive (objectifying) acts (perception, thought-acts) found emotional acts (the evaluation or feeling of values), whereas Scheler holds that emotional acts found representations or objectifying acts. This difference refers back to key points in their own conceptions of the phenomenological method and the status of objective correlates.

Describo mi confrontación con las ideas de Habermas y esbozo una manera de leer a Hegel que considero consonante con las lecciones más profundas que he aprendido de Habermas. Según mi lectura, Hegel tiene una teoría social lingüística de la normatividad y una concepción exclusivamente retrospectiva del progreso y el sentido en el cual la historia exhibe normatividad teleológica.

Review of Sebastian Luft. Meditaciones fenomenológicas y (neo)kantianas. Filosofía trascendental, cultura y teoría de las ciencias. Bogotá: Aula de Humanidades, 2019, 334pp.