This research article analyzes the regulatory changes in the labor field in Colombia during the COVID-19 pandemic and their impact on preventing digital workplace harassment. The global health emergency has generated the creation of norms aimed at regulating new forms of work, such as telework and distance work. However, the use of information and communication technologies in remote work has increased the risk of digital workplace harassment, which has generated the need to adapt regulatory provisions to the new realities of work. This essay analyzes the contribution, contradiction, practice, and evaluation of digital evidence in workplace harassment processes, where evidence becomes a fundamental element for the accreditation of facts and the generation of corresponding legal effects.

In Colombia, Law 1010 is issued on January 23, 2006, with the «purpose of defining, preventing, correcting and punishing the various forms of aggression, mistreatment, disrespectful and offensive treatment and, in general, any outrage against human dignity» (Congress of the Republic, Law 1010, 2006). These concepts are framed within the Colombian Constitutional Jurisprudence, as rights that the State has the obligation to defend for being considered from  the  constitution of 1991 a Social State of law, where human dignity is one of the principles of Greater constitutional relevance.  It  is  then  written a tour of the relevant manifestations of the Constitutional Court from the critical analysis, trying to perceive the elements that could be considered evolutionary in the protection of workers, and others that not so much could be called «evolution».