“Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES): Analysis of the factorial structure and proposal of a new version of only positive items“

Descripción del Articulo

“Introduction. The objective was to evaluate the factor structure and propose a new version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale with only positive items to overcome the method effect associated with negative items. Method. A version A (positive and negative items) and a version B (only positive items...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Vilca, Lindsey W., Travezaño-Cabrera, Aaron, Santos-Garcia, Stephany
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener
Repositorio:UWIENER-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.uwiener.edu.pe:20.500.13053/7781
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13053/7781
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, confirmatory factor analysis, self-esteem, construct validity, negative items, university students.
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.00
id UWIE_df5335094de1fe619103427588c911d7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uwiener.edu.pe:20.500.13053/7781
network_acronym_str UWIE
network_name_str UWIENER-Institucional
repository_id_str 9398
dc.title.es_ES.fl_str_mv “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES): Analysis of the factorial structure and proposal of a new version of only positive items“
title “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES): Analysis of the factorial structure and proposal of a new version of only positive items“
spellingShingle “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES): Analysis of the factorial structure and proposal of a new version of only positive items“
Vilca, Lindsey W.
Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, confirmatory factor analysis, self-esteem, construct validity, negative items, university students.
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.00
title_short “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES): Analysis of the factorial structure and proposal of a new version of only positive items“
title_full “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES): Analysis of the factorial structure and proposal of a new version of only positive items“
title_fullStr “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES): Analysis of the factorial structure and proposal of a new version of only positive items“
title_full_unstemmed “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES): Analysis of the factorial structure and proposal of a new version of only positive items“
title_sort “Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES): Analysis of the factorial structure and proposal of a new version of only positive items“
author Vilca, Lindsey W.
author_facet Vilca, Lindsey W.
Travezaño-Cabrera, Aaron
Santos-Garcia, Stephany
author_role author
author2 Travezaño-Cabrera, Aaron
Santos-Garcia, Stephany
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vilca, Lindsey W.
Travezaño-Cabrera, Aaron
Santos-Garcia, Stephany
dc.subject.es_ES.fl_str_mv Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, confirmatory factor analysis, self-esteem, construct validity, negative items, university students.
topic Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, confirmatory factor analysis, self-esteem, construct validity, negative items, university students.
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.00
dc.subject.ocde.es_ES.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.00
description “Introduction. The objective was to evaluate the factor structure and propose a new version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale with only positive items to overcome the method effect associated with negative items. Method. A version A (positive and negative items) and a version B (only positive items) were considered. A sample of 350 university students was collected for each version. Results. The CFA shows that version A's one-dimensional model (A1) does not present adequate fit indices. It was also found that adding a specific factor for negative items (model A2) and another factor for positive items (model A3) does not improve the fit indices. A twodimensional model (A4 model) does not improve the fit indices either. Regarding the onedimensional model of version B, it presents a superior fit compared to the original model (model A1) Discussion and Conclusions. It is concluded that version B, a proposal of only positive items, adequately measures self-esteem since it does not have negative items and agrees with Rosenberg's original approach. “
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-07T21:39:54Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-07T21:39:54Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.es_ES.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.es_ES.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13053/7781
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13053/7781
dc.language.iso.es_ES.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.es_ES.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.es_ES.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.format.es_ES.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es_ES.fl_str_mv Universidad de Almeria
dc.publisher.country.es_ES.fl_str_mv ES
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:UWIENER-Institucional
instname:Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener
instacron:UWIENER
instname_str Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener
instacron_str UWIENER
institution UWIENER
reponame_str UWIENER-Institucional
collection UWIENER-Institucional
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://dspace-uwiener.metabuscador.org/bitstreams/4a7f9190-5eff-40bd-a89d-c4460503b250/download
https://dspace-uwiener.metabuscador.org/bitstreams/ba5dee38-ee98-4095-af6a-e712699e5e96/download
https://dspace-uwiener.metabuscador.org/bitstreams/973c2008-2152-490f-8e6e-a173c50c7853/download
https://dspace-uwiener.metabuscador.org/bitstreams/083381f3-67c4-4473-9fb5-664e658e35c1/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 856369494cb9be7e20b538212f84ba13
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
b36e149fc30e030453632d4c056548a8
ef54e540d99be904317e39740e5c1dc8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Wiener
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1835828643612327936
spelling Vilca, Lindsey W.Travezaño-Cabrera, AaronSantos-Garcia, Stephany2023-02-07T21:39:54Z2023-02-07T21:39:54Z2022https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13053/7781“Introduction. The objective was to evaluate the factor structure and propose a new version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale with only positive items to overcome the method effect associated with negative items. Method. A version A (positive and negative items) and a version B (only positive items) were considered. A sample of 350 university students was collected for each version. Results. The CFA shows that version A's one-dimensional model (A1) does not present adequate fit indices. It was also found that adding a specific factor for negative items (model A2) and another factor for positive items (model A3) does not improve the fit indices. A twodimensional model (A4 model) does not improve the fit indices either. Regarding the onedimensional model of version B, it presents a superior fit compared to the original model (model A1) Discussion and Conclusions. It is concluded that version B, a proposal of only positive items, adequately measures self-esteem since it does not have negative items and agrees with Rosenberg's original approach. “application/pdfengUniversidad de AlmeriaESinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, confirmatory factor analysis, self-esteem, construct validity, negative items, university students.http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.00“Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES): Analysis of the factorial structure and proposal of a new version of only positive items“info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionreponame:UWIENER-Institucionalinstname:Universidad Privada Norbert Wienerinstacron:UWIENERPublicationORIGINAL5235-Texto del artículo-28451-1-10-20220404.pdf5235-Texto del artículo-28451-1-10-20220404.pdfapplication/pdf286844https://dspace-uwiener.metabuscador.org/bitstreams/4a7f9190-5eff-40bd-a89d-c4460503b250/download856369494cb9be7e20b538212f84ba13MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://dspace-uwiener.metabuscador.org/bitstreams/ba5dee38-ee98-4095-af6a-e712699e5e96/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52TEXT5235-Texto del artículo-28451-1-10-20220404.pdf.txt5235-Texto del artículo-28451-1-10-20220404.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain37314https://dspace-uwiener.metabuscador.org/bitstreams/973c2008-2152-490f-8e6e-a173c50c7853/downloadb36e149fc30e030453632d4c056548a8MD53THUMBNAIL5235-Texto del artículo-28451-1-10-20220404.pdf.jpg5235-Texto del artículo-28451-1-10-20220404.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg9673https://dspace-uwiener.metabuscador.org/bitstreams/083381f3-67c4-4473-9fb5-664e658e35c1/downloadef54e540d99be904317e39740e5c1dc8MD5420.500.13053/7781oai:dspace-uwiener.metabuscador.org:20.500.13053/77812024-12-13 14:21:10.789https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessopen.accesshttps://dspace-uwiener.metabuscador.orgRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Wienerbdigital@metabiblioteca.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
score 13.949556
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).