Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru
Descripción del Articulo
El texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Académico UPC por restricciones de la casa editorial donde ha sido publicado.
Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2015 |
Institución: | Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas |
Repositorio: | UPC-Institucional |
Lenguaje: | inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/609204 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://hdl.handle.net/10757/609204 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso embargado |
Materia: | Antibiotic resistance Children Diarrhoea Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Peru |
id |
UUPC_b9d99c61a1ea3afa628521b2c77d1841 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/609204 |
network_acronym_str |
UUPC |
network_name_str |
UPC-Institucional |
repository_id_str |
2670 |
dc.title.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru |
title |
Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru |
spellingShingle |
Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru Medina, Anicia M. Antibiotic resistance Children Diarrhoea Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Peru |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru |
title_sort |
Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru |
author |
Medina, Anicia M. |
author_facet |
Medina, Anicia M. Rivera, Fulton P. Pons, Maria J Riveros, Maribel Gomes, Cláudia Bernal, María Meza, Rina Maves, Ryan C. Huicho, Luis Chea Woo, Elsa Lanata, Claudio F. Gil, Ana I. Ochoa, Theresa J. Ruiz, Joaquim |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rivera, Fulton P. Pons, Maria J Riveros, Maribel Gomes, Cláudia Bernal, María Meza, Rina Maves, Ryan C. Huicho, Luis Chea Woo, Elsa Lanata, Claudio F. Gil, Ana I. Ochoa, Theresa J. Ruiz, Joaquim |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.email.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
joruiz@clinic.ub.es |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medina, Anicia M. Rivera, Fulton P. Pons, Maria J Riveros, Maribel Gomes, Cláudia Bernal, María Meza, Rina Maves, Ryan C. Huicho, Luis Chea Woo, Elsa Lanata, Claudio F. Gil, Ana I. Ochoa, Theresa J. Ruiz, Joaquim |
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Antibiotic resistance Children Diarrhoea Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Peru |
topic |
Antibiotic resistance Children Diarrhoea Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Peru |
description |
El texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Académico UPC por restricciones de la casa editorial donde ha sido publicado. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.accessioned.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-12T15:10:45Z |
dc.date.available.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-12T15:10:45Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2015-08 |
dc.type.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
dc.identifier.citation.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru 2015, 109 (8):493 Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene |
dc.identifier.issn.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
0035-9203 1878-3503 |
dc.identifier.doi.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
10.1093/trstmh/trv054 |
dc.identifier.uri.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/609204 |
dc.identifier.journal.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg.) |
identifier_str_mv |
Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru 2015, 109 (8):493 Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 0035-9203 1878-3503 10.1093/trstmh/trv054 Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg.) |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/609204 |
dc.language.iso.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.url.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
http://trstmh.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/trstmh/trv054 |
dc.rights.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
dc.source.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC) Repositorio Académico - UPC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:UPC-Institucional instname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas instacron:UPC |
instname_str |
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas |
instacron_str |
UPC |
institution |
UPC |
reponame_str |
UPC-Institucional |
collection |
UPC-Institucional |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/609204/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
1ed8f33c5404431ad7aabc05080746c5 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio académico upc |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
upc@openrepository.com |
_version_ |
1837187607493083136 |
spelling |
Medina, Anicia M.Rivera, Fulton P.Pons, Maria JRiveros, MaribelGomes, CláudiaBernal, MaríaMeza, RinaMaves, Ryan C.Huicho, LuisChea Woo, ElsaLanata, Claudio F.Gil, Ana I.Ochoa, Theresa J.Ruiz, Joaquimjoruiz@clinic.ub.es2016-05-12T15:10:45Z2016-05-12T15:10:45Z2015-08Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru 2015, 109 (8):493 Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene0035-92031878-350310.1093/trstmh/trv054http://hdl.handle.net/10757/609204Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg.)El texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Académico UPC por restricciones de la casa editorial donde ha sido publicado.Background Antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide, being of special concern in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility and mechanisms of resistance in 205 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates from two cohort studies in children <24 months in Lima, Peru. Methods ETEC were identified by an in-house multiplex real-time PCR. Susceptibility to 13 antimicrobial agents was tested by disk diffusion; mechanisms of resistance were evaluated by PCR. Results ETEC isolates were resistant to ampicillin (64%), cotrimoxazole (52%), tetracycline (37%); 39% of the isolates were multidrug-resistant. Heat-stable toxin producing (ETEC-st) (48%) and heat-labile toxin producing ETEC (ETEC-lt) (40%) had higher rates of multidrug resistance than isolates producing both toxins (ETEC-lt-st) (21%), p<0.05. Only 10% of isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid and none to ciprofloxacin or cefotaxime. Ampicillin and sulfamethoxazole resistance were most often associated with blaTEM (69%) and sul2 genes (68%), respectively. Tetracycline resistance was associated with tet(A) (49%) and tet(B) (39%) genes. Azithromycin inhibitory diameters were ≤15 mm in 36% of isolates, with 5% of those presenting the mph(A) gene. Conclusions ETEC from Peruvian children are often resistant to older, inexpensive antibiotics, while remaining susceptible to ciprofloxacin, cephalosporins and furazolidone. Fluoroquinolones and azithromycin remain the drugs of choice for ETEC infections in Peru. However, further development of resistance should be closely monitored.Revisión por paresapplication/pdfengOxford University Presshttp://trstmh.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/trstmh/trv054info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)Repositorio Académico - UPCreponame:UPC-Institucionalinstname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadasinstacron:UPCAntibiotic resistance67e766ba-d831-44cf-bf46-b050ff171470600Children5ad1aad6-4658-4cfa-98fe-2e470fd1ab32600Diarrhoeae46a89b1-0af8-44b3-9da5-544671ba0e3b600Enterotoxigenic Escherichia colifdab1a5e-82c7-46d4-bd0c-7a6e8a52dbed600Perud6e19394-1ad0-4de6-8bb9-5ec7e2e6d476600Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peruinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBackground Antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide, being of special concern in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility and mechanisms of resistance in 205 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates from two cohort studies in children <24 months in Lima, Peru. Methods ETEC were identified by an in-house multiplex real-time PCR. Susceptibility to 13 antimicrobial agents was tested by disk diffusion; mechanisms of resistance were evaluated by PCR. Results ETEC isolates were resistant to ampicillin (64%), cotrimoxazole (52%), tetracycline (37%); 39% of the isolates were multidrug-resistant. Heat-stable toxin producing (ETEC-st) (48%) and heat-labile toxin producing ETEC (ETEC-lt) (40%) had higher rates of multidrug resistance than isolates producing both toxins (ETEC-lt-st) (21%), p<0.05. Only 10% of isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid and none to ciprofloxacin or cefotaxime. Ampicillin and sulfamethoxazole resistance were most often associated with blaTEM (69%) and sul2 genes (68%), respectively. Tetracycline resistance was associated with tet(A) (49%) and tet(B) (39%) genes. Azithromycin inhibitory diameters were ≤15 mm in 36% of isolates, with 5% of those presenting the mph(A) gene. Conclusions ETEC from Peruvian children are often resistant to older, inexpensive antibiotics, while remaining susceptible to ciprofloxacin, cephalosporins and furazolidone. Fluoroquinolones and azithromycin remain the drugs of choice for ETEC infections in Peru. However, further development of resistance should be closely monitored.LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81659https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/609204/1/license.txt1ed8f33c5404431ad7aabc05080746c5MD51false10757/609204oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/6092042019-08-30 07:48:19.312Repositorio académico upcupc@openrepository.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 |
score |
13.889614 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).