Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Vargas Mateos, Shiovan Yamileth
Formato: tesis de grado
Fecha de Publicación:2014
Institución:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
Repositorio:UPC-Institucional
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/338214
Enlace del recurso:http://hdl.handle.net/10757/338214
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Instrumentos dentales
Desgaste de los dientes
Endodoncia
Odontología
Tesis
id UUPC_79350f2aa0b8b85ac7bbcc9ba25bc8bf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/338214
network_acronym_str UUPC
network_name_str UPC-Institucional
repository_id_str 2670
dc.title.es_PE.fl_str_mv Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia
title Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia
spellingShingle Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia
Vargas Mateos, Shiovan Yamileth
Instrumentos dentales
Desgaste de los dientes
Endodoncia
Odontología
Tesis
title_short Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia
title_full Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia
title_fullStr Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia
title_full_unstemmed Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia
title_sort Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia
author Vargas Mateos, Shiovan Yamileth
author_facet Vargas Mateos, Shiovan Yamileth
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor.fl_str_mv Vertiz Falla, Augusto Rensso
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vargas Mateos, Shiovan Yamileth
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv Instrumentos dentales
Desgaste de los dientes
Endodoncia
Odontología
Tesis
topic Instrumentos dentales
Desgaste de los dientes
Endodoncia
Odontología
Tesis
description Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were divided into three groups of ten. Teeth were divided and implemented with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® . This procedure was done by a single trained operator. For measuring the root canals, crowns of teeth were cut transversely to UCA level with a fine diamond disc. Measures corresponding to 5 anatomical references were evaluated: remaining mesial of mesiobuccal canal, vestibular of mesiobuccal canal, mesial of distobuccal canal, vestibular of distal canal and distance between wall of distal of mesiobuccal canal with wall of mesial of distalbuccal canal. The results were analyzed in microns (µm) through a stereomicroscope with a Leica Microsystems 56D software. Results: Statistically significant differences between experimental groups were found. Introfile limes produce minor discrepancy of compensatory attrition. The main discrepancy was found in group 1 (Gates Glidden) unlike the other instruments. Conclusions: The IntroFile FlexMaster® limes present lower cutting angle which produce a conservative preflaring in comparison to Gates Glidden strawberries which produce a more aggressive preflaring.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-13T19:01:18Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-13T19:01:18Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-01-12
dc.type.es_PE.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.other.es_PE.fl_str_mv Tesis
dc.type.coar.es_PE.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
format bachelorThesis
dc.identifier.uri.es_PE.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10757/338214
url http://hdl.handle.net/10757/338214
dc.language.iso.es_PE.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.ispartof.fl_str_mv SUNEDU
dc.rights.es_PE.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.es_PE.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.es_PE.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/msword
dc.publisher.es_PE.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)
dc.publisher.country.es_PE.fl_str_mv PE
dc.source.es_PE.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)
Repositorio Académico UPC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:UPC-Institucional
instname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
instacron:UPC
instname_str Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
instacron_str UPC
institution UPC
reponame_str UPC-Institucional
collection UPC-Institucional
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/1/Tesis%20Vargas.pdf
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/2/original.doc
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/7/original.epub
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/8/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/3/license.txt
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/4/Tesis%20Vargas.pdf.txt
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/6/original.doc.txt
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/9/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf.txt
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/11/Tesis%20Vargas.pdf.jpg
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/12/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e87d31294279fbf24e7521fb7e00978c
248550d1a0b74051fc4c348054c5531b
bce864a2c464f64a4ea595c37781ad83
0dc8cf21b39ce35851e4f8fdb4dc982b
1ed8f33c5404431ad7aabc05080746c5
6bfe422925bd89b0d70dfdb3b54610d5
cb9ca26ae1f6bcfa2107e38a248eb557
0b0d40bea8482df673b8c25851e8b0d3
e1af7972d3ad924cc57bebab8fa2f269
b2e1fb4a0051e281ddecf17616c22315
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio académico upc
repository.mail.fl_str_mv upc@openrepository.com
_version_ 1846065287089094656
spelling 0fac95406a4e5feea049a7e5dae331c6Vertiz Falla, Augusto Rensso8cae270b0030737acc6390163f2ad517500Vargas Mateos, Shiovan Yamileth2015-01-13T19:01:18Z2015-01-13T19:01:18Z2014-01-12http://hdl.handle.net/10757/338214Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were divided into three groups of ten. Teeth were divided and implemented with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® . This procedure was done by a single trained operator. For measuring the root canals, crowns of teeth were cut transversely to UCA level with a fine diamond disc. Measures corresponding to 5 anatomical references were evaluated: remaining mesial of mesiobuccal canal, vestibular of mesiobuccal canal, mesial of distobuccal canal, vestibular of distal canal and distance between wall of distal of mesiobuccal canal with wall of mesial of distalbuccal canal. The results were analyzed in microns (µm) through a stereomicroscope with a Leica Microsystems 56D software. Results: Statistically significant differences between experimental groups were found. Introfile limes produce minor discrepancy of compensatory attrition. The main discrepancy was found in group 1 (Gates Glidden) unlike the other instruments. Conclusions: The IntroFile FlexMaster® limes present lower cutting angle which produce a conservative preflaring in comparison to Gates Glidden strawberries which produce a more aggressive preflaring.Objetivo: El presente estudio in vitro tuvo como finalidad comparar el desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso con Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®, utilizados en tratamiento endodóntico. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó el desgaste compensatorio sobre una muestra de 30 molares superiores de plástico (VDW, Alemania) estandarizados divididos en tres grupos de 10. Los dientes fueron divididos e instrumentados con Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®, lo cual fue realizado por un solo operador capacitado. Para la medición de los conductos radiculares, se cortó transversalmente las coronas de las piezas dentales a nivel de UCA con un disco fino diamantado. Se evaluó las medidas correspondientes a 5 referencias anatómicas que fueron: remanente mesial del conducto mesio vestibular, vestibular del conducto mesio vestibular, mesial del conducto disto vestibular, vestibular del conducto distal y distancia entre la pared distal del conducto mesio vestibular con la pared mesial del conducto vestíbulo distal. Los resultados fueron analizados en micras (µm) a través de un estereomicrooscopio con software (Leica Microsystems 56D). Resultados: Se encontró diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos experimentales. Las limas IntroFile FlexMaster® producen menor discrepancia de desgaste compensatorio. La principal discrepancia se encontró en el grupo 1 (Gates Glidden) a diferencia de los demás instrumentos. Conclusiones: Las limas IntroFile FlexMaster® presentan menor ángulo de corte por lo que realiza un desgaste compensatorio conservador en comparación con las fresas Gates Glidden que realizan un desgaste compensatorio más agresivo. Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were divided into three groups of ten. Teeth were divided and implemented with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper®. This procedure was done by a single trained operator. For measuring the root canals, crowns of teeth were cut transversely to UCA level with a fine diamond disc. Measures corresponding to 5 anatomical references were evaluated: remaining mesial of mesiobuccal canal, vestibular of mesiobuccal canal, mesial of distobuccal canal, vestibular of distal canal and distance between wall of distal of mesiobuccal canal with wall of mesial of distalbuccal canal. The results were analyzed in microns (µm) through a stereomicroscope with a Leica Microsystems 56D software. Results: Statistically significant differences between experimental groups were found. Introfile limes produce minor discrepancy of compensatory attrition. The main discrepancy was found in group 1 (Gates Glidden) unlike the other instruments. Conclusions: The IntroFile FlexMaster® limes present lower cutting angle which produce a conservative preflaring in comparison to Gates Glidden strawberries which produce a more aggressive preflaring.Tesisapplication/pdfapplication/mswordspaUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)PEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)Repositorio Académico UPCreponame:UPC-Institucionalinstname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadasinstacron:UPCInstrumentos dentalesDesgaste de los dientesEndodonciaOdontologíaTesisComparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodonciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisTesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fSUNEDUUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC). Facultad de Ciencias de la SaludLicenciaturaOdontologíaCirujano dentista2018-06-17T16:59:50ZObjective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were divided into three groups of ten. Teeth were divided and implemented with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® . This procedure was done by a single trained operator. For measuring the root canals, crowns of teeth were cut transversely to UCA level with a fine diamond disc. Measures corresponding to 5 anatomical references were evaluated: remaining mesial of mesiobuccal canal, vestibular of mesiobuccal canal, mesial of distobuccal canal, vestibular of distal canal and distance between wall of distal of mesiobuccal canal with wall of mesial of distalbuccal canal. The results were analyzed in microns (µm) through a stereomicroscope with a Leica Microsystems 56D software. Results: Statistically significant differences between experimental groups were found. Introfile limes produce minor discrepancy of compensatory attrition. The main discrepancy was found in group 1 (Gates Glidden) unlike the other instruments. Conclusions: The IntroFile FlexMaster® limes present lower cutting angle which produce a conservative preflaring in comparison to Gates Glidden strawberries which produce a more aggressive preflaring.Objetivo: El presente estudio in vitro tuvo como finalidad comparar el desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso con Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®, utilizados en tratamiento endodóntico. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó el desgaste compensatorio sobre una muestra de 30 molares superiores de plástico (VDW, Alemania) estandarizados divididos en tres grupos de 10. Los dientes fueron divididos e instrumentados con Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®, lo cual fue realizado por un solo operador capacitado. Para la medición de los conductos radiculares, se cortó transversalmente las coronas de las piezas dentales a nivel de UCA con un disco fino diamantado. Se evaluó las medidas correspondientes a 5 referencias anatómicas que fueron: remanente mesial del conducto mesio vestibular, vestibular del conducto mesio vestibular, mesial del conducto disto vestibular, vestibular del conducto distal y distancia entre la pared distal del conducto mesio vestibular con la pared mesial del conducto vestíbulo distal. Los resultados fueron analizados en micras (µm) a través de un estereomicrooscopio con software (Leica Microsystems 56D). Resultados: Se encontró diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos experimentales. Las limas IntroFile FlexMaster® producen menor discrepancia de desgaste compensatorio. La principal discrepancia se encontró en el grupo 1 (Gates Glidden) a diferencia de los demás instrumentos. Conclusiones: Las limas IntroFile FlexMaster® presentan menor ángulo de corte por lo que realiza un desgaste compensatorio conservador en comparación con las fresas Gates Glidden que realizan un desgaste compensatorio más agresivo. Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were divided into three groups of ten. Teeth were divided and implemented with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper®. This procedure was done by a single trained operator. For measuring the root canals, crowns of teeth were cut transversely to UCA level with a fine diamond disc. Measures corresponding to 5 anatomical references were evaluated: remaining mesial of mesiobuccal canal, vestibular of mesiobuccal canal, mesial of distobuccal canal, vestibular of distal canal and distance between wall of distal of mesiobuccal canal with wall of mesial of distalbuccal canal. The results were analyzed in microns (µm) through a stereomicroscope with a Leica Microsystems 56D software. Results: Statistically significant differences between experimental groups were found. Introfile limes produce minor discrepancy of compensatory attrition. The main discrepancy was found in group 1 (Gates Glidden) unlike the other instruments. Conclusions: The IntroFile FlexMaster® limes present lower cutting angle which produce a conservative preflaring in comparison to Gates Glidden strawberries which produce a more aggressive preflaring.https://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/type#tesishttps://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/nivel#tituloProfesionalORIGINALTesis Vargas.pdfTesis Vargas.pdfapplication/pdf1341273https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/1/Tesis%20Vargas.pdfe87d31294279fbf24e7521fb7e00978cMD51true2085-01-13original.docoriginal.docapplication/msword23443456https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/2/original.doc248550d1a0b74051fc4c348054c5531bMD52falseoriginal.epuboriginal.epubapplication/epub4056129https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/7/original.epubbce864a2c464f64a4ea595c37781ad83MD57false2085-01-13Vargas Mateos.pdfVargas Mateos.pdfFormato de autorizaciónapplication/pdf1653214https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/8/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf0dc8cf21b39ce35851e4f8fdb4dc982bMD58falseLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81659https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/3/license.txt1ed8f33c5404431ad7aabc05080746c5MD53falseTEXTTesis Vargas.pdf.txtTesis Vargas.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain70260https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/4/Tesis%20Vargas.pdf.txt6bfe422925bd89b0d70dfdb3b54610d5MD54false2085-01-13original.doc.txtoriginal.doc.txtExtracted texttext/plain71405https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/6/original.doc.txtcb9ca26ae1f6bcfa2107e38a248eb557MD56false2085-01-13Vargas Mateos.pdf.txtVargas Mateos.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain2https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/9/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf.txt0b0d40bea8482df673b8c25851e8b0d3MD59falseTHUMBNAILTesis Vargas.pdf.jpgTesis Vargas.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg31587https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/11/Tesis%20Vargas.pdf.jpge1af7972d3ad924cc57bebab8fa2f269MD511false2085-01-13Vargas Mateos.pdf.jpgVargas Mateos.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg225028https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/12/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf.jpgb2e1fb4a0051e281ddecf17616c22315MD512falseCONVERTED2_118821610757/338214oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/3382142025-07-19 20:28:27.55Repositorio académico upcupc@openrepository.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
score 13.438731
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).