Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were d...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | tesis de grado |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2014 |
| Institución: | Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas |
| Repositorio: | UPC-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/338214 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://hdl.handle.net/10757/338214 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Instrumentos dentales Desgaste de los dientes Endodoncia Odontología Tesis |
| id |
UUPC_79350f2aa0b8b85ac7bbcc9ba25bc8bf |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/338214 |
| network_acronym_str |
UUPC |
| network_name_str |
UPC-Institucional |
| repository_id_str |
2670 |
| dc.title.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia |
| title |
Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia |
| spellingShingle |
Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia Vargas Mateos, Shiovan Yamileth Instrumentos dentales Desgaste de los dientes Endodoncia Odontología Tesis |
| title_short |
Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia |
| title_full |
Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia |
| title_fullStr |
Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia |
| title_sort |
Comparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodoncia |
| author |
Vargas Mateos, Shiovan Yamileth |
| author_facet |
Vargas Mateos, Shiovan Yamileth |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.advisor.fl_str_mv |
Vertiz Falla, Augusto Rensso |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vargas Mateos, Shiovan Yamileth |
| dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Instrumentos dentales Desgaste de los dientes Endodoncia Odontología Tesis |
| topic |
Instrumentos dentales Desgaste de los dientes Endodoncia Odontología Tesis |
| description |
Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were divided into three groups of ten. Teeth were divided and implemented with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® . This procedure was done by a single trained operator. For measuring the root canals, crowns of teeth were cut transversely to UCA level with a fine diamond disc. Measures corresponding to 5 anatomical references were evaluated: remaining mesial of mesiobuccal canal, vestibular of mesiobuccal canal, mesial of distobuccal canal, vestibular of distal canal and distance between wall of distal of mesiobuccal canal with wall of mesial of distalbuccal canal. The results were analyzed in microns (µm) through a stereomicroscope with a Leica Microsystems 56D software. Results: Statistically significant differences between experimental groups were found. Introfile limes produce minor discrepancy of compensatory attrition. The main discrepancy was found in group 1 (Gates Glidden) unlike the other instruments. Conclusions: The IntroFile FlexMaster® limes present lower cutting angle which produce a conservative preflaring in comparison to Gates Glidden strawberries which produce a more aggressive preflaring. |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-13T19:01:18Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-13T19:01:18Z |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-12 |
| dc.type.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
| dc.type.other.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Tesis |
| dc.type.coar.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
| format |
bachelorThesis |
| dc.identifier.uri.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/338214 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/338214 |
| dc.language.iso.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.ispartof.fl_str_mv |
SUNEDU |
| dc.rights.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.format.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/msword |
| dc.publisher.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC) |
| dc.publisher.country.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
PE |
| dc.source.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC) Repositorio Académico UPC |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:UPC-Institucional instname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas instacron:UPC |
| instname_str |
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas |
| instacron_str |
UPC |
| institution |
UPC |
| reponame_str |
UPC-Institucional |
| collection |
UPC-Institucional |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/1/Tesis%20Vargas.pdf https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/2/original.doc https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/7/original.epub https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/8/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/3/license.txt https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/4/Tesis%20Vargas.pdf.txt https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/6/original.doc.txt https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/9/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf.txt https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/11/Tesis%20Vargas.pdf.jpg https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/12/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e87d31294279fbf24e7521fb7e00978c 248550d1a0b74051fc4c348054c5531b bce864a2c464f64a4ea595c37781ad83 0dc8cf21b39ce35851e4f8fdb4dc982b 1ed8f33c5404431ad7aabc05080746c5 6bfe422925bd89b0d70dfdb3b54610d5 cb9ca26ae1f6bcfa2107e38a248eb557 0b0d40bea8482df673b8c25851e8b0d3 e1af7972d3ad924cc57bebab8fa2f269 b2e1fb4a0051e281ddecf17616c22315 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio académico upc |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
upc@openrepository.com |
| _version_ |
1846065287089094656 |
| spelling |
0fac95406a4e5feea049a7e5dae331c6Vertiz Falla, Augusto Rensso8cae270b0030737acc6390163f2ad517500Vargas Mateos, Shiovan Yamileth2015-01-13T19:01:18Z2015-01-13T19:01:18Z2014-01-12http://hdl.handle.net/10757/338214Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were divided into three groups of ten. Teeth were divided and implemented with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® . This procedure was done by a single trained operator. For measuring the root canals, crowns of teeth were cut transversely to UCA level with a fine diamond disc. Measures corresponding to 5 anatomical references were evaluated: remaining mesial of mesiobuccal canal, vestibular of mesiobuccal canal, mesial of distobuccal canal, vestibular of distal canal and distance between wall of distal of mesiobuccal canal with wall of mesial of distalbuccal canal. The results were analyzed in microns (µm) through a stereomicroscope with a Leica Microsystems 56D software. Results: Statistically significant differences between experimental groups were found. Introfile limes produce minor discrepancy of compensatory attrition. The main discrepancy was found in group 1 (Gates Glidden) unlike the other instruments. Conclusions: The IntroFile FlexMaster® limes present lower cutting angle which produce a conservative preflaring in comparison to Gates Glidden strawberries which produce a more aggressive preflaring.Objetivo: El presente estudio in vitro tuvo como finalidad comparar el desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso con Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®, utilizados en tratamiento endodóntico. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó el desgaste compensatorio sobre una muestra de 30 molares superiores de plástico (VDW, Alemania) estandarizados divididos en tres grupos de 10. Los dientes fueron divididos e instrumentados con Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®, lo cual fue realizado por un solo operador capacitado. Para la medición de los conductos radiculares, se cortó transversalmente las coronas de las piezas dentales a nivel de UCA con un disco fino diamantado. Se evaluó las medidas correspondientes a 5 referencias anatómicas que fueron: remanente mesial del conducto mesio vestibular, vestibular del conducto mesio vestibular, mesial del conducto disto vestibular, vestibular del conducto distal y distancia entre la pared distal del conducto mesio vestibular con la pared mesial del conducto vestíbulo distal. Los resultados fueron analizados en micras (µm) a través de un estereomicrooscopio con software (Leica Microsystems 56D). Resultados: Se encontró diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos experimentales. Las limas IntroFile FlexMaster® producen menor discrepancia de desgaste compensatorio. La principal discrepancia se encontró en el grupo 1 (Gates Glidden) a diferencia de los demás instrumentos. Conclusiones: Las limas IntroFile FlexMaster® presentan menor ángulo de corte por lo que realiza un desgaste compensatorio conservador en comparación con las fresas Gates Glidden que realizan un desgaste compensatorio más agresivo. Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were divided into three groups of ten. Teeth were divided and implemented with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper®. This procedure was done by a single trained operator. For measuring the root canals, crowns of teeth were cut transversely to UCA level with a fine diamond disc. Measures corresponding to 5 anatomical references were evaluated: remaining mesial of mesiobuccal canal, vestibular of mesiobuccal canal, mesial of distobuccal canal, vestibular of distal canal and distance between wall of distal of mesiobuccal canal with wall of mesial of distalbuccal canal. The results were analyzed in microns (µm) through a stereomicroscope with a Leica Microsystems 56D software. Results: Statistically significant differences between experimental groups were found. Introfile limes produce minor discrepancy of compensatory attrition. The main discrepancy was found in group 1 (Gates Glidden) unlike the other instruments. Conclusions: The IntroFile FlexMaster® limes present lower cutting angle which produce a conservative preflaring in comparison to Gates Glidden strawberries which produce a more aggressive preflaring.Tesisapplication/pdfapplication/mswordspaUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)PEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)Repositorio Académico UPCreponame:UPC-Institucionalinstname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadasinstacron:UPCInstrumentos dentalesDesgaste de los dientesEndodonciaOdontologíaTesisComparación in vitro del desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso (Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®) utilizados en endodonciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisTesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fSUNEDUUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC). Facultad de Ciencias de la SaludLicenciaturaOdontologíaCirujano dentista2018-06-17T16:59:50ZObjective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were divided into three groups of ten. Teeth were divided and implemented with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® . This procedure was done by a single trained operator. For measuring the root canals, crowns of teeth were cut transversely to UCA level with a fine diamond disc. Measures corresponding to 5 anatomical references were evaluated: remaining mesial of mesiobuccal canal, vestibular of mesiobuccal canal, mesial of distobuccal canal, vestibular of distal canal and distance between wall of distal of mesiobuccal canal with wall of mesial of distalbuccal canal. The results were analyzed in microns (µm) through a stereomicroscope with a Leica Microsystems 56D software. Results: Statistically significant differences between experimental groups were found. Introfile limes produce minor discrepancy of compensatory attrition. The main discrepancy was found in group 1 (Gates Glidden) unlike the other instruments. Conclusions: The IntroFile FlexMaster® limes present lower cutting angle which produce a conservative preflaring in comparison to Gates Glidden strawberries which produce a more aggressive preflaring.Objetivo: El presente estudio in vitro tuvo como finalidad comparar el desgaste compensatorio de tres instrumentos de acceso con Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®, utilizados en tratamiento endodóntico. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó el desgaste compensatorio sobre una muestra de 30 molares superiores de plástico (VDW, Alemania) estandarizados divididos en tres grupos de 10. Los dientes fueron divididos e instrumentados con Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® y SX ProTaper®, lo cual fue realizado por un solo operador capacitado. Para la medición de los conductos radiculares, se cortó transversalmente las coronas de las piezas dentales a nivel de UCA con un disco fino diamantado. Se evaluó las medidas correspondientes a 5 referencias anatómicas que fueron: remanente mesial del conducto mesio vestibular, vestibular del conducto mesio vestibular, mesial del conducto disto vestibular, vestibular del conducto distal y distancia entre la pared distal del conducto mesio vestibular con la pared mesial del conducto vestíbulo distal. Los resultados fueron analizados en micras (µm) a través de un estereomicrooscopio con software (Leica Microsystems 56D). Resultados: Se encontró diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos experimentales. Las limas IntroFile FlexMaster® producen menor discrepancia de desgaste compensatorio. La principal discrepancia se encontró en el grupo 1 (Gates Glidden) a diferencia de los demás instrumentos. Conclusiones: Las limas IntroFile FlexMaster® presentan menor ángulo de corte por lo que realiza un desgaste compensatorio conservador en comparación con las fresas Gates Glidden que realizan un desgaste compensatorio más agresivo. Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare preflaring of three instruments of access with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper® used in endodontic treatment. Materials and methods: The preflaring was performed over 30 plastic upper molars (VDW, Germany) standardized which were divided into three groups of ten. Teeth were divided and implemented with Gates Glidden, IntroFile FlexMaster® and SX ProTaper®. This procedure was done by a single trained operator. For measuring the root canals, crowns of teeth were cut transversely to UCA level with a fine diamond disc. Measures corresponding to 5 anatomical references were evaluated: remaining mesial of mesiobuccal canal, vestibular of mesiobuccal canal, mesial of distobuccal canal, vestibular of distal canal and distance between wall of distal of mesiobuccal canal with wall of mesial of distalbuccal canal. The results were analyzed in microns (µm) through a stereomicroscope with a Leica Microsystems 56D software. Results: Statistically significant differences between experimental groups were found. Introfile limes produce minor discrepancy of compensatory attrition. The main discrepancy was found in group 1 (Gates Glidden) unlike the other instruments. Conclusions: The IntroFile FlexMaster® limes present lower cutting angle which produce a conservative preflaring in comparison to Gates Glidden strawberries which produce a more aggressive preflaring.https://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/type#tesishttps://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/nivel#tituloProfesionalORIGINALTesis Vargas.pdfTesis Vargas.pdfapplication/pdf1341273https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/1/Tesis%20Vargas.pdfe87d31294279fbf24e7521fb7e00978cMD51true2085-01-13original.docoriginal.docapplication/msword23443456https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/2/original.doc248550d1a0b74051fc4c348054c5531bMD52falseoriginal.epuboriginal.epubapplication/epub4056129https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/7/original.epubbce864a2c464f64a4ea595c37781ad83MD57false2085-01-13Vargas Mateos.pdfVargas Mateos.pdfFormato de autorizaciónapplication/pdf1653214https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/8/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf0dc8cf21b39ce35851e4f8fdb4dc982bMD58falseLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81659https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/3/license.txt1ed8f33c5404431ad7aabc05080746c5MD53falseTEXTTesis Vargas.pdf.txtTesis Vargas.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain70260https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/4/Tesis%20Vargas.pdf.txt6bfe422925bd89b0d70dfdb3b54610d5MD54false2085-01-13original.doc.txtoriginal.doc.txtExtracted texttext/plain71405https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/6/original.doc.txtcb9ca26ae1f6bcfa2107e38a248eb557MD56false2085-01-13Vargas Mateos.pdf.txtVargas Mateos.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain2https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/9/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf.txt0b0d40bea8482df673b8c25851e8b0d3MD59falseTHUMBNAILTesis Vargas.pdf.jpgTesis Vargas.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg31587https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/11/Tesis%20Vargas.pdf.jpge1af7972d3ad924cc57bebab8fa2f269MD511false2085-01-13Vargas Mateos.pdf.jpgVargas Mateos.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg225028https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/10757/338214/12/Vargas%20Mateos.pdf.jpgb2e1fb4a0051e281ddecf17616c22315MD512falseCONVERTED2_118821610757/338214oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/3382142025-07-19 20:28:27.55Repositorio académico upcupc@openrepository.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 |
| score |
13.438731 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).