Retrofit Proposal for a 70-Year-Old Educational Building in a High-Seismicity Zone
Descripción del Articulo
This article analyses the structural behaviour of an educational pavilion more than 70 years old in a highly seismic area, with damage to beams and columns attributed to the current use of the roof as a warehouse, in addition to having a high probability of collapse according to the FEMA P-154 seism...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas |
| Repositorio: | UPC-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/687166 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://hdl.handle.net/10757/687166 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | nonlinear analysis RC jacketing structural reinforcement vulnerability https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.01.01 |
| Sumario: | This article analyses the structural behaviour of an educational pavilion more than 70 years old in a highly seismic area, with damage to beams and columns attributed to the current use of the roof as a warehouse, in addition to having a high probability of collapse according to the FEMA P-154 seismic vulnerability study. Diamond extractions were carried out based on the ASCE 41-06 standard to obtain the compressive strength of the columns and beams. After the tests, linear and nonlinear analysis were performed based on the E.030 and ASCE 41-17 standards, respectively. The structural modelling confirmed non-compliance with the maximum distortion of 7/1000 allowed by the standard for the Y-axis gantry system. Therefore, RC jacketing was proposed as a reinforcement alternative according to the UNAM reinforcement guide and the IS 15988:2013 standard. The encasement of columns along the Y-axis reduced the drift by 58%, while the encasement of beams resulted in a 45% reduction. However, when implemented separately, neither of the seen casements met the regulatory limit, prompting the adoption of a combined encasement solution, which achieved an 80% reduction. Whereas the pushover analysis indicated that in the event of frequent and occasional earthquakes, the reinforced structure would be fully operational, which shows the importance of developing a reinforcement plan at the superstructure level addressed in this research, which not only offers a reinforcement solution, but also serves as a reference for similar initiatives in other countries. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).